No Magic MagicDraw Logo

No Magic MagicDraw pros and cons

Vendor: Dassault
4.1 out of 5
913 followers
Post review
 

No Magic MagicDraw Pros review quotes

WL
Jan 30, 2021
The beauty of MagicDraw is that it has a simulation part, so you can simulate your model to validate it. The simulation allows you to bring in code off of an external code that you can write to set up the simulation and execute the code.
TJ
Jun 27, 2020
When you look at it, No Magic is an all-encompassing tool. You can use it for business architecture design. You can use it for deploying an ERP system across your enterprise. However, it was initially designed and developed for model-based systems engineering. That's the systems engineering required to either produce an IP system or product. It takes away the mounds of paper and puts it into a model. It enables you to generate significant savings by modeling that new product or that system before you ever start developing a prototype.
WM
Jul 19, 2020
The most valuable feature is the amount of flexibility that one has to model, which is great for an individual.
Learn what your peers think about No Magic MagicDraw. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
LY
Aug 17, 2022
It is pretty easy to use. It is pretty versatile.
KC
Apr 19, 2020
The technical support is very good.
JOSETRELLES - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 31, 2023
I like the traceability feature. Whoever is working with the product would be sure of the things that could be affected if they decided to affect one of the other companies. For example, let's say that an engineer starts a new project optimization problem by adjusting the thickness of metal sheets. However, the engineers only see a reduced number of affections, but when we use the requirement traceability, they can see the whole picture. That's the main aspect that we were promoting with this tool.
Korhan Candan - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 11, 2023
It is very user-friendly, and the customer service is really good.
TJ
Nov 4, 2019
The most valuable feature is the ability to quickly build multiple layers within the organizational and business process environments, as well as in the SysML product environments, and converting to files that can be accessed by clients who do not have a system and a teamwork server access.
MH
May 21, 2021
I think one of the key things is the plugins for integration with requirements management tools like Doors
PF
Feb 1, 2023
The most valuable feature of No Magic MagicDraw is the simulation capabilities and interface.
 

No Magic MagicDraw Cons review quotes

WL
Jan 30, 2021
For the next releases, I would like to have them import requirements from other sources. They could make it very easy to do that because there are a lot requirements management tools like DOORS, D-O-O-R-S, Dynamic Object Oriented Management. A lot of folks use DOORS to create a requirement. For those requirements you allocate them to a component in the architecture and a verification method for that requirement. It would be good if we could import those into MagicDraw as components so you don't have to manually do these things.
TJ
Jun 27, 2020
There's lots of documentation. They process multiples of guides. They've got all kinds of guides and documentation out there, but it's kind of hard to find. There are a lot of videos. You can go to YouTube and find videos on how it's been used in different ways, but it just kind of scratches the surface.
WM
Jul 19, 2020
When I am working with my Mac and I right-click to copy and paste, it doesn't work.
Learn what your peers think about No Magic MagicDraw. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
LY
Aug 17, 2022
They don't really support code engineering, and that's why we have to move to Enterprise Architect. MagicDraw is stuck at C++03 standards, whereas most C++ programs today want to use the latest definition of the C++ standards. We were at C++11, and we wanted to do code engineering with C++11 or 17, but they didn't support it. That pushed us into a different tool, which is Sparx Enterprise Architect.
KC
Apr 19, 2020
The cost of upgrading the product should be lower.
JOSETRELLES - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 31, 2023
It would be better if the User Interface were updated. At the moment, it's a classic environment. It reminds me of the old Windows interface, for example, Windows 95. It would be better to make it more user-friendly. It would also be better if it could integrate with SAP solutions. It isn't easy to find experts in the field. It's hard to find people around the globe that have the necessary skills and expertise to manage this solution. For example, in our case, we needed someone with refrigeration knowledge that also knew how to use the tool, and that was a challenge. We also had issues relating to erasing. Sometimes, it kept it in the background and didn't erase it at all. We had to review the entire list to ensure that the item was deleted.
Korhan Candan - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 11, 2023
One potential area for improvement is the recommendation feature. At times, we face challenges in locating specific features, and we have to reach out for assistance in finding the information we need.
TJ
Nov 4, 2019
I would like to see the ability to deploy live business process models and capture real-time data (without the need for another product tool) so you don't have to be dependent on other products for this functionality.
MH
May 21, 2021
The UI UX of the tool is not really user-friendly and needs to be completely reformed.
PF
Feb 1, 2023
The price of the solution could be reduced.