Compare No Magic MagicDraw vs. Visual Paradigm

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Camunda BPM Logo
35,334 views|23,059 comparisons
No Magic MagicDraw Logo
6,666 views|3,379 comparisons
Visual Paradigm Logo
8,262 views|5,965 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about No Magic MagicDraw vs. Visual Paradigm and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
455,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"For an internal project, this is a solution that you can install and have up and running quite quickly.""We are documenting all of the processors and VPN. Then we are sharing it with our business users.""I've found the active community most valuable but it also provides you with a lot of other features.""The number of client implementations and cross-language capabilities to support multiple frameworks is very pluggable compared to Pega. It's also more portable.""The most valuable feature is the ability to share the logic within the rules engine with the business, so you can put it up for everybody to read.""When I compare it with other BPM tools, like IBM, it is great, open source, and free when you use the community version.""The solution is easily compatible with HTML forms and HTML language programming and that is the most significant part.""The speed and execution of DMN was a big selling point for us. It's very good at conducting business processes that are easily modeled and presented in a way that's easy to understand."

More Camunda BPM Pros »

"The most valuable feature is the ability to quickly build multiple layers within the organizational and business process environments, as well as in the SysML product environments, and converting to files that can be accessed by clients who do not have a system and a teamwork server access.""The technical support is very good.""When you look at it, No Magic is an all-encompassing tool. You can use it for business architecture design. You can use it for deploying an ERP system across your enterprise. However, it was initially designed and developed for model-based systems engineering. That's the systems engineering required to either produce an IP system or product. It takes away the mounds of paper and puts it into a model. It enables you to generate significant savings by modeling that new product or that system before you ever start developing a prototype.""The most valuable feature is the amount of flexibility that one has to model, which is great for an individual.""The most valuable features are the visibility, standard compliance, and interface.""I would rate MagicDraw a nine out of ten because of the price. Enterprise Architect has a lot of bugs and MagicDraw is a lot more accurate and flexible. It's a level better.""The MBFC capability of MagicDraw is higher than the other competitors."

More No Magic MagicDraw Pros »

"Using the Component Diagram, Visual Paradigm helps with design and control, reusing components.""I like the fact that this solution is complete.""The solution is stable. It hasn't crashed, stopped or caused any issues in any way.""The solution is very user-friendly. It's easy to just open it and start working.""The pricing model is attractive.""The initial setup is straightforward.""It is easy-to-use and it helps understand its data modeling structure through the intuitive user interface."

More Visual Paradigm Pros »

Cons
"The GUI needs to be improved, with more configuration options.""When you search for Camunda BPM resources or books on how to utilize Camunda BPM, it is lacking. When it comes to Alfresco, there are thousands of resources that can help you to utilize within AWS and its Group Services. I would like to see the usage of Camunda BPM on Amazon Web Services be improved.""I would say that Camunda should actually focus on small cases as well. There's a lot of space out there, for small businesses. If they can, they should cater to them.""The user interface needs improvement. It should be more tailored to the end-user and offer a better user experience design over the user interface itself.""I would like to see the forms engine available in the open-source version of this solution.""I would like to have a feature for audit logging, audit logs and audit log management. And some history of use for the audit logs.""I would also like a very easy to use form builder.""Especially when you use the open-source version, there are issues with performance."

More Camunda BPM Cons »

"I would like to see the ability to deploy live business process models and capture real-time data (without the need for another product tool) so you don't have to be dependent on other products for this functionality.""The cost of upgrading the product should be lower.""There's lots of documentation. They process multiples of guides. They've got all kinds of guides and documentation out there, but it's kind of hard to find. There are a lot of videos. You can go to YouTube and find videos on how it's been used in different ways, but it just kind of scratches the surface.""When I am working with my Mac and I right-click to copy and paste, it doesn't work.""It's very focused on specific modern languages and it doesn't do necessarily general systems software engineering with diagrams. They should expand the diagram types for the languages.""The licenses are expensive compared to similar tools. At the moment, the user is open to using MagicDraw if it's 15% more than other solutions. If it were to cost any more, they wouldn't use it.""The documentation for MagicDraw and the video tutorials compared to other competitors is an area for improvement."

More No Magic MagicDraw Cons »

"I would like to see the ability to easily export to groupware, such as Atlassian Confluence.""I would like to see something for visualizing innovation work maps.""The solution is not user-friendly. It uses a lot of memory and CPU. You have to have a good computer to use it.""The solution could be more compatible with other products in the future.""There are some connectivity issues that crop up rarely when used with SQL Server.""The solution can be heavy on resource usage."

More Visual Paradigm Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"We are using the open-source version of this solution.""Camunda is much cheaper.""I use the open-source free version.""The open-source version of the product is free to use.""The cost of this solution is better than some competing products.""Licensing costs are anywhere from $80,000 to $100,000 USD per year.""We use the open-source version, which can be used at no cost.""I think Camunda BPM can improve their licensing costs. It isn't easy to find clients with Camunda BPM licenses mainly because it's quite expensive."

More Camunda BPM Pricing and Cost Advice »

"In addition to the initial cost, you have to pay annually for support in order to get the upgrades.""I would say licensing would be anywhere from $3,500 to $6,500 per person or per seat (it's a per seat style license)."

More No Magic MagicDraw Pricing and Cost Advice »

"Over the years I've seen an increase in price, and it makes it difficult for a single person company, like me, to decide whether to extend the license.""You can use Paradigm on a subscription basis and you can choose from different tiers of subscription.""You can move between the tiers from month to month so you are not restricted to one pricing model."

More Visual Paradigm Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Design solutions are best for your needs.
455,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Hi dear knauf its pleasure to see you in a good position, you were always in the top of specialist. your advise and… more »
Top Answer: The most valuable features are the visibility, standard compliance, and interface.
Top Answer: In addition to the initial cost, you have to pay annually for support in order to get the upgrades.
Top Answer: It's very focused on specific modern languages and it doesn't do necessarily general systems software engineering with… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Popular Comparisons
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 3% of the time.
Compared 3% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Also Known As
MagicDraw
Learn
camunda
Dassault
Visual Paradigm
Video Not Available
Overview

Camunda BPM is a light-weight, open source platform for Business Process Management. It is a perfect match for general software development and provides powerful business-IT-alignment based on BPMN for structured workflows, CMMN for less structured cases and DMN for business rules.

Typical use cases for Camunda BPM are:

  • Straight Through Processing (STP)
  • Human Workflow Management
  • (Dynamic) Case Management
  • Business Rule Automation
MagicDraw is the award-winning business process, architecture, software and system modeling tool with teamwork support. Designed for Business Analysts, Software Analysts, Programmers, QA Engineers, and Documentation Writers, this dynamic and versatile development tool facilitates analysis and design of Object Oriented (OO) systems and databases. Visual Paradigm is a UML tool. The tool is designed for a wide range of users including software engineers, system analysts, business analysts and system architects, or for anyone who is interested in reliably building large-scale software systems using an object-oriented approach. In addition, Visual Paradigm supports the latest standards of UML notation.
Offer
Learn more about Camunda BPM
Learn more about No Magic MagicDraw
Learn more about Visual Paradigm
Sample Customers
AT&T Inc., Allianz Indonesia, Deutsche WertpapierService Bank AG, CSS Insurance, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, VHV Group, freenet Group, Swisscom AG, Zalando SE, AccruentNorthrop Grumman, Labcorp, Deposco, ClearView Training, IT Services Promotion Agency, Intelligent Chaos, Metalithic Systems Inc., SodifranceAdobe, Apple, at&t, Caterpillar, Intel, NASA, Nokia, Toyota
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm31%
Comms Service Provider23%
Non Profit15%
Government15%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company30%
Comms Service Provider19%
Financial Services Firm11%
Government6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company28%
Comms Service Provider17%
Manufacturing Company13%
Government11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider27%
Computer Software Company22%
Government7%
Educational Organization6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business52%
Midsize Enterprise17%
Large Enterprise31%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise22%
Large Enterprise64%
REVIEWERS
Small Business91%
Midsize Enterprise9%
REVIEWERS
Small Business56%
Midsize Enterprise22%
Large Enterprise22%
Find out what your peers are saying about No Magic MagicDraw vs. Visual Paradigm and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
455,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

No Magic MagicDraw is ranked 12th in Business Process Design with 7 reviews while Visual Paradigm is ranked 10th in Business Process Design with 5 reviews. No Magic MagicDraw is rated 7.8, while Visual Paradigm is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of No Magic MagicDraw writes "Great for model-based engineering with lots of excellent features and good technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visual Paradigm writes "Data modeling through an interface that makes it easy-to-use and understand". No Magic MagicDraw is most compared with Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, Visio, IBM System Architect, ARIS BPM and Bizagi, whereas Visual Paradigm is most compared with Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, Visio, ARIS BPM, Bizagi and Signavio Process Manager. See our No Magic MagicDraw vs. Visual Paradigm report.

See our list of best Business Process Design vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.