Compare Infor M3 vs. Microsoft Dynamics AX
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros | |
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the Infor GL tool that allows us to do our application support and development." | "It was an okay solution when we delivered hardware and we had to do maintenance." "Dynamics AX provides a lot of functionality." |
Cons | |
"The implementation could be simplified, it's complex." | "It is being decommissioned." "The product is standardised across industries so it is not a good fit for all types of sectors." |
Pricing and Cost Advice | |
Information Not Available | "The pricing is expensive." "It's too expensive for customers to take this on themselves. As partners, we will buy this on behalf of the customers and then charge this value for each project." |
 Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ERP solutions are best for your needs. 455,301 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Ranking  | |
Views 2,420 Comparisons 2,225 Reviews 1 Average Words per Review 384 Rating 8.0 | Views 3,653 Comparisons 2,602 Reviews 2 Average Words per Review 901 Rating 6.5 |
Popular Comparisons | |
 Compared 42% of the time.  Compared 22% of the time. Compared 7% of the time.  Compared 5% of the time.  Compared 4% of the time. | Compared 27% of the time. Compared 17% of the time. Compared 9% of the time. Compared 9% of the time. Compared 3% of the time. |
Also Known As | |
| Infor Lawson M3, Lawson M3 | Dynamics AX, Axapta |
Learn | |
| Infor | Microsoft |
Overview | |
Infor M3 offers ultimate flexibility in operations, technology, and scale. As a multi-site, multi-country, and multi-company solution, M3 empowers your organization to adapt to changing business needs. It provides flexibility in managing mixed-mode and complex environments, with the agility to make quick adjustments at any time. Written in Java, M3 also gives you platform independence and choice. | Microsoft Dynamics AX is an enterprise resource planning (ERP) solution that is simple to learn and use so you can deliver value faster, take advantage of business opportunities, and drive user involvement and innovation across the organization. |
Offer | |
Learn more about Infor M3 | Learn more about Microsoft Dynamics AX |
Sample Customers | |
| Grosfillex, High Five Sportswear, L_derach, OTK Group, PHS Group, Propper International, Red Wing Shoe Company, Reynolds Catering Supplies, Saudi Diesel, Sheetz, Zeppelin, Zodiac Aerospace | ConQuaestor, D & H Distributing, Sunny Queen, Mesa Associates, Britax Childcare, Ibema, Arafa, Sabo S.p.A. |
Top Industries | |
Comms Service Provider31% Computer Software Company27% Media Company5% Manufacturing Company5% | Computer Software Company26% Comms Service Provider26% Media Company7% Energy/Utilities Company5% |
Company Size | |
No Data Available | Small Business73% Large Enterprise27% |
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Oracle, IFS and others in ERP. Updated: January 2021.
455,301 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Infor M3 is ranked 11th in ERP with 1 review while Microsoft Dynamics AX is ranked 8th in ERP with 2 reviews. Infor M3 is rated 8.0, while Microsoft Dynamics AX is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of Infor M3 writes "Helps to keep things in order, and they have good technical support that is responsive". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Dynamics AX writes "Provides a lot of functionality". Infor M3 is most compared with Infor LN, SAP ERP, SAP S4HANA, Oracle ERP Cloud and IFS Applications, whereas Microsoft Dynamics AX is most compared with SAP S4HANA, SAP ERP, Oracle E-Business Suite, JD Edwards EnterpriseOne and PeopleSoft.
See our list of best ERP vendors and best Activity Based Costing Software vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.