Compare JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs. Microsoft Dynamics AX
 | Maggie Van Wyk Chief Financial and Operating Officer at Aicrem Square |
 | Anonymous User Data Analytics Manager at a tech services company |
Find out what your peers are saying about JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs. Microsoft Dynamics AX and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
464,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"The solution is very customizable according to business needs."
"The most valuable feature is the user experience, where you can create your own queries, it sends you alerts, and it's very flexible."
"The interface is very user-friendly."
"It was an okay solution when we delivered hardware and we had to do maintenance."
"Dynamics AX provides a lot of functionality."
"If anyone is familiar with Microsoft products then they can handle it easily."
"I like that it's a complete ERP solution from production level to branch level."
"It is stable, suitable for businesses, and covers all business needs."
"The relation between CRM and Sales, that's the main strength of this ERP."
Cons
"Financial side could be expanded by bringing in things like the IMS."
"I would like to see the HR features enhanced with respect to localization for South Africa and other countries."
"We originally used EnterpriseOne for preventative maintenance, but it is not very good at that so we migrated to Maximo for that task."
"It is being decommissioned."
"The product is standardised across industries so it is not a good fit for all types of sectors."
"There should be the capability for users to enhance the application by using a low-code or no-code product from the Microsoft family."
"There are so many errors."
"There is no Arabic interface in Microsoft Business Central, which is a big weak point."
"They should include some modules related to solving customer problems or resolving support tickets from our customers — like a help desk for ERPs."
"The licensing is for mid-market businesses, where it is cheaper than Oracle Cloud, EBS, or SAP."
"The pricing is expensive."
"It's too expensive for customers to take this on themselves. As partners, we will buy this on behalf of the customers and then charge this value for each project."
"It is $180 to $200 per user per month with a minimum of 20 users, which makes selling the product a bit difficult."
"I don't know how much this solution costs off the top of my head, but I know that the cloud and SaaS solutions are cheaper."
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ERP solutions are best for your needs.
464,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Top Answer: I think Panorama Consulting Group publishes some of their ERP shootouts comparing SAP/Oracle/Microsoft with Infor thrown in as a bonus.
Our firm is more of a boutique operation that compares… more »
Views
9,089
Comparisons
7,390
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
738
Rating
9.3
Views
3,628
Comparisons
2,512
Reviews
5
Average Words per Review
567
Rating
7.6
Compared 19% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 2% of the time.
Compared 26% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Dynamics AX, Axapta
Oracle's JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is an integrated applications suite of comprehensive enterprise resource planning software that combines business value, standards-based technology, and deep industry experience into a business solution with a low total cost of ownership. EnterpriseOne is the first ERP solution to run all applications on Apple iPad. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne also delivers mobile applications.
Microsoft Dynamics AX is an enterprise resource planning (ERP) solution that is simple to learn and use so you can deliver value faster, take advantage of business opportunities, and drive user involvement and innovation across the organization.
Learn more about JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Learn more about Microsoft Dynamics AX
TechNova Imaging Systems (P) Ltd, Jordan Petroleum Refinery, Hosun Universal Co. Ltd., Grupo Corporativo Papelera SA de CV, Label Technology Inc., Uniwax S.A., Al Jaber Group, SOMAR Corporation, SICIM S.p.A.,
ConQuaestor, D & H Distributing, Sunny Queen, Mesa Associates, Britax Childcare, Ibema, Arafa, Sabo S.p.A.
Energy/Utilities Company24%
Construction Company18%
Retailer12%
Manufacturing Company12%
Computer Software Company38%
Comms Service Provider14%
Energy/Utilities Company5%
Media Company5%
Computer Software Company27%
Comms Service Provider25%
Media Company6%
Energy/Utilities Company6%
Small Business30%
Midsize Enterprise26%
Large Enterprise44%
Small Business73%
Midsize Enterprise7%
Large Enterprise20%
Find out what your peers are saying about JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs. Microsoft Dynamics AX and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
464,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is ranked 6th in ERP with 3 reviews while Microsoft Dynamics AX is ranked 7th in ERP with 6 reviews. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is rated 9.4, while Microsoft Dynamics AX is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne writes "User-friendly, flexible and easy to customize, and offers good support for different industries". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Dynamics AX writes "Provides a lot of functionality". JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is most compared with JD Edwards World, Oracle E-Business Suite, Oracle ERP Cloud, SAP ERP and Microsoft Dynamics NAV, whereas Microsoft Dynamics AX is most compared with SAP S4HANA, SAP ERP, Oracle E-Business Suite, Oracle ERP Cloud and IFS Applications. See our JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs. Microsoft Dynamics AX report.
See our list of best ERP vendors and best Activity Based Costing Software vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.