Polarion Requirements Reviews

Filter by:Reset all filters
industry
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Company Size
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Job Level
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
rating
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
IstvanZsikla
Real User
Assistant Engineer at Zsikla István
Oct 14 2019

What is most valuable?

I like the way this solution is structured.

What needs improvement?

This solution has its limits. If we have more than one thousand work items in one live-book then it becomes almost unusable. For example, if you are trying to use a finance book then the loading times will be so long that you will time-out… more»

If you previously used a different solution, which one did you use and why did you switch?

I have used IBM Rational DOORS, but I think that it is a bit old school. It is only usable from one perspective. DOORS is better than this solution with respect to import and export because you don't have as many problems. For example, in… more»

What other advice do I have?

My advice for anybody who is implementing this solution is to use it only for smaller projects. I cannot think of any features that should be added, but some effort should be put into making the existing ones more usable. I would rate this… more»

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

I also evaluated codeBeamer after we had adopted this solution. I think that it may be more modern and have more straightforward use cases.
Leadevteam67
Real User
Lead of Development Team at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Sep 05 2019

What is most valuable?

The tool as a whole is very valuable. It isn't just one or two features. The combination of requirement and test management is very good for us.

How has it helped my organization?

The biggest improvement would be in the transparency we have now. We have very complex products. We make whole systems with difficult and diverse areas such as hardware, software, mechanical and printing, etc. To get the overview of all the… more»

What needs improvement?

The one thing I would mention is the license policy is a little bit difficult. For different roles, you will need different license models. That seems a little bit difficult for us. Especially when you introduce such a complex system, you… more»

If you previously used a different solution, which one did you use and why did you switch?

I have experience, from the very basic former engineering requirement, with Excel. It's not really acceptable for the complex items we have. We had another product which was not so good because of the user experience. We have chosen… more»

What other advice do I have?

We are using the on-premises deployment model. My advice to others considering implementing the solution is that you should check your requirements for such a tool and process. Everything depends on the company. Our experience was to first… more»

Articles

User Assessments By Topic About Polarion Requirements

Find out what your peers are saying about Siemens, Atlassian, IBM and others in Application Requirements Management. Updated: October 2019.
372,374 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Polarion Requirements Questions

What is Polarion Requirements?

Polarion REQUIREMENTS is designed from the ground for highly effective, transparent and secure collaboration, while teams have the option to work in their familiar environments.
Polarion Requirements customers
NetSuite, Ottobock, Zumtobel Group, Kªster Automotive GmbH, Sirona Dental Systems, LifeWatch, U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), PHOENIX CONTACT Electronics GmbH, Metso Corporation
BUYER'S GUIDE
Download our free Application Requirements Management Report and find out what your peers are saying about Siemens, Atlassian, IBM, and more!
Sign Up with Email