Compare Jama Connect vs. Polarion ALM

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Jama Connect Logo
3,753 views|2,964 comparisons
Polarion ALM Logo
2,466 views|1,721 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use Polarion ALM? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Jama Connect vs. Polarion ALM and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
457,209 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"Technical support answers fairly quickly compared to others like IBM or Atlassian. They also offer quite a good knowledge base for advanced cases and how to plan it, etc. via videos that they provide. They are quite useful.""The most valuable feature is the user-friendly interface."

More Jama Connect Pros »

"The initial setup of this solution was straightforward, and there were not too many problems with it.""You can see the work ticket and you can circulate that within the teams. You can define your flows, customize according to your needs, and you can create dashboards and create the reports according to your needs.""We had a nice experience with technical support.""It meets with everybody's needs without having to grab plugins.""The technical support is quite good."

More Polarion ALM Pros »

Cons
"Test management can be improved. It's not so scalable. The user interface needs to split things into small projects.""t is rather slow, so the speed of the process and consuming information should be improved. It doesn't have a nice way of viewing information. We would like to see better interfaces for consuming information.""I have inquired about pricing for this solution but have not yet heard anything, so their response time in this regard is something that should be improved."

More Jama Connect Cons »

"The interface for this solution needs to be made more user-friendly to provide a better user experience.""The most important thing for them to improve should be platform-independent features. They should also provide extensive pipelines and release pipelines that we can define and we can work on.""The ease-of-use could be improved a little.""Technical support needs some improvement.""The configuration aspect of the solution is not easy. A person needs a lot of programming knowledge in order to successfully handle the job."

More Polarion ALM Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"To have a single source for all the requirements and all the change requests our company gets is the most valuable feature. It has also helped us to keep track of reviews."

More Jama Connect Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The license model is okay for large companies but would be quite expensive for smaller enterprises.""If the pricing would come down and it was more affordable then we wouldn't have to switch."

More Polarion ALM Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.
457,209 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The most valuable feature is the user-friendly interface.
Top Answer: I have inquired about pricing for this solution but have not yet heard anything, so their response time in this regard is something that should be improved. For example, listing the pricing structure… more »
Top Answer: I use Jama Connect for requirement management.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
3,753
Comparisons
2,964
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
435
Rating
7.0
Views
2,466
Comparisons
1,721
Reviews
5
Average Words per Review
592
Rating
7.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 29% of the time.
Compared 24% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Compared 26% of the time.
Compared 19% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Learn
Jama
Siemens
Overview
Web-based requirements management application designed to help you increase collaboration, manage complexity and fuel innovation.

The world’s first 100% browser-based ALM enterprise solution, which enables seamless collaboration across disparate teams, multi-directionally linked work items, full traceability, accelerated productivity and automated proof of compliance.

Offer
Learn more about Jama Connect
Learn more about Polarion ALM
Sample Customers
Deloitte, SpaceX, Omnigon, Delft UniversityEngineering Ingegneria Informatica, IBS AG, Zumtobel Group
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company21%
Manufacturing Company19%
Comms Service Provider12%
Healthcare Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider23%
Computer Software Company23%
Manufacturing Company19%
Healthcare Company5%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business29%
Midsize Enterprise14%
Large Enterprise57%
Find out what your peers are saying about Jama Connect vs. Polarion ALM and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
457,209 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Jama Connect is ranked 18th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 3 reviews while Polarion ALM is ranked 8th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 5 reviews. Jama Connect is rated 7.0, while Polarion ALM is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Jama Connect writes "An excellent cloud solution that is a very user friendly and mature". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Polarion ALM writes "The amount of document control, combined with review and release probabilities and signatures is really useful". Jama Connect is most compared with Jira, IBM Rational DOORS, Polarion Requirements, codeBeamer ALM and Micro Focus ALM Octane, whereas Polarion ALM is most compared with Jira, PTC Integrity, Microsoft Azure DevOps, codeBeamer ALM and IBM Engineering Workflow Management. See our Jama Connect vs. Polarion ALM report.

See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.