Compare Juniper SRX vs. NetFortris Threat Analyzer
Juniper SRX is ranked 11th in Firewalls with 19 reviews while NetFortris Threat Analyzer is ranked 36th in Firewalls. Juniper SRX is rated 7.6, while NetFortris Threat Analyzer is rated 0. The top reviewer of Juniper SRX writes "This best in class Next-Gen firewall is elegant in its ease-of-use and architecture". On the other hand, Juniper SRX is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate, Palo Alto Networks WildFire, pfSense, Meraki MX and Cisco Firepower NGFW, whereas NetFortris Threat Analyzer is most compared with Palo Alto Networks WildFire.
Sponsored | ||
Most Helpful Review | ||||
| Use NetFortris Threat Analyzer? Share your opinion. | |||
 Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Cisco, pfSense and others in Firewalls. Updated: July 2020. 431,081 professionals have used our research since 2012. | ||||
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice | ||
Always consider what you might need to reduce your wasted time and invest it in other solutions. There is room for improvement in the pricing when compared to the market. Although, when you compare the benefits of support from Cisco, you can adjust the value and it becomes comparable, because you usually need very good support. So you gain value there with this device. When it comes to Cisco, the price of everything is higher. Cisco firewalls are expensive, but we get support from Cisco, and that support is very active. It's a brilliant firewall, and the fact that it comes with a perpetual license really does go far in terms of helping the organization in not having to deal with those costs on an annual basis. That is a pain point when it comes to services like the ones we have on Fortigate. That's where we really give Cisco firewalls the thumbs up. Cisco is expensive, but you do get benefits for the price. In terms of costs, other solutions are more expensive than Cisco. Palo Alto is more expensive than Cisco. Pricing varies on the model and the features we are using. It could be anywhere from $600 to $1000 to up to $7,000 per year, depending on what model and what feature sets are available to us. We used Check Point and the two are comparable. Cost was really what put us onto the ASAs... the price tag for Check Point was exorbitantly more than what it is for the ASA solution. | Compared to other vendors, the pricing of this solution is good. There was no additional licensing cost because there were no IPS services. It was just a firewall IP circuit router so they have the default licensing. We just need to renew the support yearly. The price of this solution is more than other products, but it's stable, and the technical support is better than I have seen with others. While the price of support is expensive, the price of the solution, itself, is not. The pricing is perhaps half, probably forty percent, of Cisco. The direct support with Juniper is expensive. When you stop using the solution and miss one year of payments, if you want the support back on a specific node, they ask you to pay for the year that you haven't used the node. In terms of pricing, Juniper is in the middle. The most expensive firewall is Palo Alto. If a customer wants the cheapest price they should go for FortiGate. Juniper is in between these products. | Information Not Available |
 Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Firewalls solutions are best for your needs. 431,081 professionals have used our research since 2012. | ||
Popular Comparisons | ||
 Compared 36% of the time.  Compared 13% of the time. Compared 9% of the time.  Compared 6% of the time.  Compared 3% of the time. | Compared 34% of the time.  Compared 13% of the time.  Compared 7% of the time. Compared 4% of the time. Compared 3% of the time. | Compared 100% of the time. |
Also Known As | ||
| Cisco ASA, Adaptive Security Appliance, ASA, Cisco Sourcefire Firewalls | SRX | |
Learn | ||
| Cisco | Juniper | NetFortris |
Overview  | ||
Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) is Cisco's end-to-end software solution and core operating system that powers the Cisco ASA product series. This software solution provides enterprise-level firewall capabilities for all types of ASA products, including blades, standalone appliances and virtual devices. Adaptive Security Appliance provides protection to organizations of all sizes, and allows end-users to access information securely anywhere, at any time, and through any device. Adaptive Security Appliance is also fully compatible with other key security technologies, and so provides organizations with an all-encompassing security solution. Block more threats and quickly mitigate those that do breach your defenses with the industry’s first threat-focused NGFW. | High-performance security with advanced, integrated threat intelligence, delivered on the industry's most scalable and resilient platform. SRX Series gateways set new benchmarks with 100GbE interfaces and feature Express Path technology, which enables up to 1 Tbps performance for the data center. | NetFortris Threat Analyzer is a unified threat management solution that collects and analyzes data from all security solutions and hosted firewalls on your network. |
Offer | ||
Learn more about Cisco ASA NGFW | Learn more about Juniper SRX | Learn more about NetFortris Threat Analyzer |
Sample Customers | ||
| There are more than one million Adaptive Security Appliances deployed globally. Top customers include First American Financial Corp., Genzyme, Frankfurt Airport, Hansgrohe SE, Rio Olympics, The French Laundry, Rackspace, and City of Tomorrow. | 7-Eleven, AARNet Pty Ltd, Allegro Networks, alltours GmbH, Apollo Hotel Papendrecht, Armstrong Atlantic State University, Atlantech Online, Availity, Bajaj Capital, Baloise Insurance, BancABC, BAS Group, Black Lotus, Blue Box, Borealis, Carilion Clinic, Catholic Health System, CATV, Champlain College, Chinas Ministry of Railways, China University of Mining and Technology (CUMT), Cloud Dynamics, CloudSeeds, Cloudwatt, CODONiS, Colt Technology Services, Cork Internet Exchange, CSS Versicherung AG, CyrusOne, Danish Crown, Deloitte Belgium, Department of Energy, Divona Telecom, DQE Communications, DreamHost, European Government Agency, Expedient, Financial Market Information Services Provider, Fluidata, Fonality, Fox Sports, Global Financial Institution, Global Investment Bank, Global Investment Company, Energy Sciences Network (ESnet), Goethe University, HEAnet, High Performance Networks Inc., Hillenbrand | Information Not Available |
Top Industries | ||
Financial Services Firm20% Manufacturing Company10% Comms Service Provider9% University8% Computer Software Company28% Comms Service Provider21% Media Company7% Government5% | Comms Service Provider56% Financial Services Firm17% Energy/Utilities Company11% Media Company6% Computer Software Company32% Comms Service Provider31% Media Company8% K 12 Educational Company Or School4% | No Data Available |
Company Size | ||
Small Business35% Midsize Enterprise25% Large Enterprise40% Small Business32% Midsize Enterprise21% Large Enterprise46% | Small Business42% Midsize Enterprise16% Large Enterprise42% | No Data Available |
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Cisco, pfSense and others in Firewalls. Updated: July 2020.
431,081 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Firewalls vendors.
We monitor all Firewalls reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post
reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference
with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.