We performed a comparison between Microsoft Power Apps and Temenos Quantum based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Rapid Application Development Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's a very workable solution because it's an automated way of making applications. You have a template, you have the application know-how,"
"It offers integration with several Microsoft products, including SharePoint and Outlook, in my opinion, is a huge plus."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the Model-driven or Canvas application-making platforms. The power of the two gives us exactly what we are looking for."
"The solution is very straightforward. Its context is obvious and everything is easy to understand."
"You can easily connect Power Apps with other databases, like Excel, SharePoint, SQL, etc."
"When I am developing any user UI, it gives me complete flexibility. I can manage in any way I want."
"The product has good usability, in terms of low-code applications."
"I would say that it's a very advanced product because it empowers people to do simple things, which previously may have required people to have some technical skills."
"With the new VM releases, it is a faster product with more abilities that benefit the user."
"The most valuable feature is usability. You can develop components inside it and reuse them in different parts of your application, wherever needed. You can replicate them. There's also a Quantum Fabric on the back end, which provides a middle layer between your database and the third-party systems you need to integrate. It also provides the integration to handle all sorts of exceptions and timeouts on the Fabric. This makes it easy to troubleshoot errors coming from third-party APIs."
"I like the complete, professional social site."
"It is a single platform that can cater to mobile and web development requirements, making it convenient for businesses looking to transition into the digital space."
"You can build your own customized, native, mobile applications in an efficient matter."
"The visualizer and API manager are super useful. It's easy to create applications for the agent. Automations and other complex tasks can be hard, but it's mostly straightforward. You can create forms and populate tables."
"You can do rapid development across multiple platforms."
"Comparing other solutions with Temenos Quantum, the later is less mature and presents several issues. Implementing Temenos Quantum has been challenging, resembling a nightmare compared to the smoother experience with the other."
"PowerApps can't do a lot of things that users need now. For example, it can't handle signatures."
"Integration with databases and other tools needs to be improved."
"Can be improved to cater to complex developments."
"The set up of the solution could be simpler."
"The fact that we couldn't share that with our other organization or outside of the organization, consisting of our colleagues in the joint ventures, was a weakness of the solution."
"Improvements to the capturing of geographic locations and integration with maps would raise my score of the product from seven point five to its maximum of ten."
"Microsoft PowerApps can improve the number of bugs that are present. When you are using the different applications it is not accurate."
"One area where the solution lacks is the limited size of the database it offers its users."
"It would be highly beneficial if future iterations of Temenos could incorporate support for QR-based payment methods, as it would enhance the platform's capabilities and align it more closely with modern payment trends"
"We would like to have widgets for graphs and analytics, as well as the integration of machine learning."
"The technology of the solution needs an update. It is deficient in terms of connectivity."
"Temenos Quantum needs to improve its usability. It lacks information on the network. We have to contact the support when we are stuck with something."
"There is definitely room for improvement, especially in the areas of AI, AR, and DR for mobile and web applications"
"One area where Temenos Quantum could improve is in the flexibility of widgets and additional libraries."
"The UI lacks flexibility, especially regarding customizations. There are numerous issues at the fabric end, and working with the visualizer is extremely challenging. Basic development tasks require a high-end machine, and even clicking on an icon initiates a thirty-second processing time. The challenges mainly revolve around fabric and content."
"Using the API manager can be complicated when you're dealing with multiple teams, projects, and APIs. Quantum doesn't have user-based access, so I can't restrict parts of the project to specific users."
Microsoft Power Apps is ranked 1st in Rapid Application Development Software with 77 reviews while Temenos Quantum is ranked 18th in Rapid Application Development Software with 15 reviews. Microsoft Power Apps is rated 7.8, while Temenos Quantum is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of Microsoft Power Apps writes "Low-code, low learning curve, and reduces manpower". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Temenos Quantum writes "Though a secure tool for building applications, there is a need to improve its stability". Microsoft Power Apps is most compared with Mendix, Oracle Application Express (APEX), ServiceNow, Appian and OutSystems, whereas Temenos Quantum is most compared with OutSystems, ServiceNow, Mendix and Microsoft Azure App Service. See our Microsoft Power Apps vs. Temenos Quantum report.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors and best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
