Compare MarkLogic vs. Oracle NoSQL

MarkLogic is ranked 14th in NoSQL Databases while Oracle NoSQL is ranked 9th in NoSQL Databases. MarkLogic is rated 0, while Oracle NoSQL is rated 0. On the other hand, MarkLogic is most compared with MongoDB, Neo4j and Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop, whereas Oracle NoSQL is most compared with MongoDB, Cassandra and Couchbase.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
MarkLogic Logo
884 views|788 comparisons
Oracle NoSQL Logo
1,511 views|1,250 comparisons
Ranking
14th
out of 14 in NoSQL Databases
Views
884
Comparisons
788
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
9th
out of 14 in NoSQL Databases
Views
1,511
Comparisons
1,250
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Top Comparisons
Compared 39% of the time.
Compared 19% of the time.
Compared 37% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Learn
MarkLogic
Oracle
Overview
MarkLogic is an operational and transactional Enterprise NoSQL database that is designed to integrate, store, manage and search SON and XML documents and semantic data (RDF Triples).

The Oracle NoSQL Database (ONDB) provides network-accessible multiterabyte distributed key/value pair storage with predictable latency. Data is stored in a very flexible key-value format, where the key consists of the combination of a major and minor key (represented as a string) and an associated value (represented as a JSON data format or opaque set of bytes). It offers full Create, Read, Update and Delete (CRUD) operations, with adjustable durability and consistency guarantees. It also provides powerful and flexible transactional model that eases the application development.

The Oracle NoSQL Database is designed to be a highly available and extremely scalable system, with predictable levels of throughput and latency, while requiring minimal administrative interaction.

For more information on Oracle NoSQL Database, visit Oracle.com

Offer
Learn more about MarkLogic
Learn more about Oracle NoSQL
Sample Customers
ALM, American Psychological Association, American Society of Agronomy, Cond_ Nast, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Institute of Engineering and Technology, JWG Group, LagardĀre Active, RSuite CMS, WileyAirbus, Globacom, WebAction
We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.