Matillion ETL vs Tungsten RPA comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Matillion Logo
3,247 views|2,215 comparisons
95% willing to recommend
Tungsten Automation Logo
3,147 views|2,345 comparisons
82% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Matillion ETL and Tungsten RPA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Matillion ETL vs. Tungsten RPA Report (Updated: March 2024).
769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It has good integrations with Amazon Redshift and other AWS services.""The most valuable feature of Matillion ETL is its ease of use. If you have had some experience with other solutions, such as Snowflake, the use of this solution will be simple.""The technical support treats us well. They already have a support portal, and they are responsive, which helps.""It takes less than five minutes to set up and delivers results. It is much quicker than traditional ETL technologies.""It's highly scalable. It takes upon itself the Redshift scalability, so it's very good.""It is an incredibly user-friendly and intuitive tool, making the learning curve quite smooth""The loading of data is the most valuable feature of Matillion ETL.""Matillion ETL has great Git integration that is perfect and convenient to use."

More Matillion ETL Pros →

"You can automate browsing tasks without needing a server connection. The platform provides its browser, allowing you to run anything inside it.""The solution is scalable.""The pricing of the solution is quite good.""The most valuable feature of Kofax RPA is the simplicity of automating tasks.""The product provided all the security controls that we asked them.""The best part of Kofax is that they have a whole concept. It's one product, but also has extra elements that can be integrated.""It is very simple and easy to learn compared to any other RPA tools such as UiPath, Automation Anywhere and Blue Prism.""Kofax handles UIs via the browser well. If it's not possible, they have other features like modeling screen scrapes, etc."

More Tungsten RPA Pros →

Cons
"The current version is a bit more limited because it's on a virtual machine, and everything executes on that one virtual machine.""The cost of the solution is high and could be reduced.""There are certain functions that are available in other ETL tools which are still not present in Matillion ETL. It would be good to have more features.""Ideally, I would like it to integrate with Secrets Manager as well as the AWS.""The product must enhance its near-real-time data capture feature.""While the UI is good, it could be improved in its efficiency and made easier to use.""In the next release, we would like to have connections to more databases.""Performance can be improved for efficiency, and it can be made faster."

More Matillion ETL Cons →

"I'd like to see a recording function and a more simple interface.""Kofax RPA's UI could be more user-friendly.""The product should improve desktop automation, which is hard to configure. It needs to have custom connectors. It is the only advantage that Microsoft Power Platform has over Kofax RPA. It has more than 800 custom connectors.""Kofax RPA could improve web-based automation and there should be a choice of what browser we can use, such as Google Chrome, instead of an inbuilt browser from Kofax RPA. Additionally, Kofax RPA is missing an orchestrator that other solutions have, such as UiPath.""This product has room for improvement in support of aviation. The interface could be improved in the next release.""The interface could be better from a usability standpoint.""The technical support must be improved.""The solution needs to be scalable."

More Tungsten RPA Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I have heard from my manager and other higher ups, "This product is cheaper than other things on the market," and they have done the research."
  • "It is cost-effective. Based on our use case, it's efficient and cheap. It saves a lot of money and our upfront costs are less."
  • "The prices needs to be lower."
  • "It was very easy to purchase through the AWS Marketplace, but it was also expensive."
  • "Purchasing it through the AWS Marketplace is pretty convenient. There is a little bit of back and forth in terms of the licensing based on the machine size, but it seems to have worked out well. it is convenient to have it all as part of our AWS billing."
  • "It is not necessarily a cheap solution. However, it's reasonable priced, especially with the smaller machines that we run it on."
  • "The AWS pricing and licensing are a cost-effective solution for data integration needs."
  • "It was procured through the AWS Marketplace because it keeps things simple. They offer retail-like checkout and bill through your existing Amazon Web Services account."
  • More Matillion ETL Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The normal price for an on-premises license is €50,000. That's the price for one robot license. You can have more than one robot license but only one can be run at any one time. I believe the cost of adding a second robot is around €14,000."
  • "Price is not a problem, because they are a competitor and we have a special rate."
  • "I don't have complete insight at this point in time, but I would guess that Kofax is a lot less expensive than Automation Anywhere. I would expect its license to be on a yearly basis."
  • "Its pricing is reasonable given the product capabilities. Kofax has a wide range of products, and it can sometimes be confusing to understand which capabilities come with which product set. One of the key facets that we've been looking into recently is cognitive document recognition that was a core pile of some of their other technologies such as Kofax transformation modules (KTM)."
  • "Kofax's prices are pretty reasonable."
  • "There is a standard license needed to use Kofax RPA and the price is reasonable."
  • "Kofax RPA is moderately priced but expensive in comparison to UiPath and Power Automate."
  • "I give the price of the solution a six out of ten."
  • More Tungsten RPA Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.
    769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The new version with the Productivity Cloud is very simple. It's easy to use, navigate, and understand.
    Top Answer:The pricing depends on what edition the customer opts for. For example, a standard edition and then business critical of different editions. Each of those has a different cost per unit, which is… more »
    Top Answer:One of the features that's in development is data privacy in the cloud, along with further SAP integration. For connectivity to SAP systems.
    Top Answer:You can automate browsing tasks without needing a server connection. The platform provides its browser, allowing you to run anything inside it.
    Top Answer:Previously, Tungsten RPA offered perpetual licenses, but now it has a subscription-based model for more flexibility, similar to the Microsoft developer platform.
    Top Answer:Tungsten RPA features enhanced desktop automation capabilities, improved Active Directory integration, and upgraded recorder functionality. These updates will be available in the upcoming release… more »
    Ranking
    4th
    Views
    3,247
    Comparisons
    2,215
    Reviews
    13
    Average Words per Review
    687
    Rating
    8.6
    Views
    3,147
    Comparisons
    2,345
    Reviews
    11
    Average Words per Review
    429
    Rating
    7.4
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Matillion ETL for Redshift, Matillion ETL for Snowflake, Matillion ETL for BigQuery
    Kofax RPA, Kofax Kapow, Kapow
    Learn More
    Overview

    Matillion ETL is a powerful tool for extracting, transforming, and loading large amounts of data from various sources into cloud data warehouses like Snowflake. Its ability to load data dynamically and efficiently using metadata is a standout feature, as is its open-source ETL with good performance and high efficiency. 

    The solution has a graphical interface for jobs, is easily adjustable and extensible, and allows for scheduling and error reporting. Matillion ETL has helped organizations move to a cloud-based solution, bridge the gap between on-premises and on-cloud, and perform complex migration projects.

    Tungsten RPA offers an efficient solution for streamlining business processes through Robotic Process Automation (RPA), which utilizes software "bots" to automate tasks like data entry and form filling. With Tungsten RPA, organizations can enjoy increased efficiency as repetitive tasks are automated, freeing up human resources for more strategic work. Moreover, the software ensures improved accuracy by performing tasks consistently and error-free, leading to reduced costs and enhanced compliance with regulations. Key features include a low-code design environment for easy workflow creation, intelligent document processing for handling unstructured data, automated process discovery, and flexible deployment options suitable for on-premises, cloud, or hybrid environments. Tungsten RPA presents a comprehensive solution for optimizing operational efficiency and driving business success through automation.
    Sample Customers
    Thrive Market, MarketBot, PWC, Axtria, Field Nation, GE, Superdry, Quantcast, Lightbox, EDF Energy, Finn Air, IPRO, Twist, Penn National Gaming Inc
    Aetna, BNP Paribas, Citi, Goldman Sachs, HSBC, ING, Aviva, Humana, Willis, Merck, University Hospitals, CardinalHealth, American Red Cross, Alegri, Capita
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm33%
    Manufacturing Company33%
    Healthcare Company8%
    Computer Software Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government8%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company25%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Energy/Utilities Company15%
    Logistics Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company13%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise35%
    Large Enterprise43%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise68%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business36%
    Midsize Enterprise4%
    Large Enterprise61%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise67%
    Buyer's Guide
    Matillion ETL vs. Tungsten RPA
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Matillion ETL vs. Tungsten RPA and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Matillion ETL is ranked 4th in Cloud Data Integration with 24 reviews while Tungsten RPA is ranked 12th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 24 reviews. Matillion ETL is rated 8.6, while Tungsten RPA is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Matillion ETL writes "Efficient data integration and transformation with seamless cloud-native integration". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tungsten RPA writes "A stable product that provides end-to-end solutions for different business problems". Matillion ETL is most compared with Snowflake, Azure Data Factory, AWS Glue, Informatica PowerCenter and SSIS, whereas Tungsten RPA is most compared with UiPath, Microsoft Power Automate, Blue Prism, Automation Anywhere (AA) and SAS Data Management. See our Matillion ETL vs. Tungsten RPA report.

    See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

    We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.