Micro Focus Service Test vs. SmartBear TestComplete

Micro Focus Service Test is ranked 36th in Functional Testing Tools vs SmartBear TestComplete which is ranked 4th in Functional Testing Tools with 15 reviews. The top reviewer of SmartBear TestComplete writes "Allows us to test both desktop and web applications". Micro Focus Service Test is most compared with SoapUI Pro, UFT (QTP) and LoadRunner. SmartBear TestComplete is most compared with UFT (QTP), Ranorex and Selenium HQ.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Micro Focus Service Test? Share your opinion.
Use Null Product? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Tricentis, Sauce Labs and others in Functional Testing Tools.
301,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing Micro Focus Service Test vs. SmartBear TestComplete

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
The license price for a physical machine is cheap, and for virtual machine, it is very expensive.Our ROI is about $10,000 a year.TestComplete now have come up with three modules (Web, Desktop & Mobile), so based on the type of product for automation, it is adequate to purchase the required module.Buy modules on demand. If you have a four-person team and they will each automate tests only 25% of the time, it's better to buy a floating licence and share the tool during the work day.The price is less, compared to other products, such as QTP.My advice so far, is that while it’s not quite as powerful and easy to use as UFT, its price tag more than makes up for it.The product is becoming more and more expensive.

Read more »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
301,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
711
Comparisons
221
Reviews
0
Followers
210
Avg. Rating
N/A
Views
31,570
Comparisons
12,638
Reviews
15
Followers
1,251
Avg. Rating
7.8
Views
0
Comparisons
0
Reviews
1
Followers
1
Avg. Rating
5.0
Top Comparisons
See more Micro Focus Service Test competitors »
Compared 22% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
See more SmartBear TestComplete competitors »
Also Known As
Service Test, HPE Service Test
Website/Video
Micro Focus
SmartBear Software
Null Vendor
Overview

Micro Focus Service Test is based on Virtual User Generator (VuGen) like Micro Focus LoadRunner software, which is code-centric and uses a technical interface that can be challenging for functional testing teams to utilize. It has also had instances of difficulty parsing some Web Services Description Languages (WSDLs) for complex services.

TestComplete is a powerful and robust automated testing tool for mobileweb and desktop  applications. Quickly and easily create accurate and repeatable tests across multiple devices, platforms and environments – regardless of experience level. It supports multiple languages, modern control sets and integrates with open source frameworks and tools like Selenium, SoapUI and Jenkins.

Information Not Available
OFFER
Learn more about Micro Focus Service Test
Learn more about SmartBear TestComplete
Learn more about Null Product
Sample Customers
John Lewis, SEED Infotech, Bajaj Allianz, TMNAS, Hexaware, Brewin Dolphin, A U.S. bankCisco, J.P. Morgan, Boeing, McAfee, EMC, Intuit, and Thomson Reuters.
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Tricentis, Sauce Labs and others in Functional Testing Tools.
Download now
301,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email