Compare Micro Focus Service Test vs. SmartBear TestComplete

Micro Focus Service Test is ranked 37th in Functional Testing Tools while SmartBear TestComplete is ranked 4th in Functional Testing Tools with 9 reviews. Micro Focus Service Test is rated 0, while SmartBear TestComplete is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of SmartBear TestComplete writes "Easy set up and test creation but the test object repository needs improvement". Micro Focus Service Test is most compared with , whereas SmartBear TestComplete is most compared with Ranorex Studio, Katalon Studio, Micro Focus UFT One, Tricentis Tosca and Eggplant Functional.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Micro Focus Service Test? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, Micro Focus and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: July 2020.
430,585 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
The option we chose was around $2,000 USD.The license price for a physical machine is cheap, and for virtual machine, it is very expensive.Our ROI is about $10,000 a year.This is a pay-per-use service that is not expensive, and cost-efficient if you have a small team.TestComplete now have come up with three modules (Web, Desktop & Mobile), so based on the type of product for automation, it is adequate to purchase the required module.

More SmartBear TestComplete Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
430,585 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
37th
Views
125
Comparisons
90
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
4th
Views
19,559
Comparisons
13,010
Reviews
9
Average Words per Review
417
Avg. Rating
8.0
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Service Test, HPE Service Test
Learn
Micro Focus
SmartBear
Overview

Micro Focus Service Test is based on Virtual User Generator (VuGen) like Micro Focus LoadRunner software, which is code-centric and uses a technical interface that can be challenging for functional testing teams to utilize. It has also had instances of difficulty parsing some Web Services Description Languages (WSDLs) for complex services.

TestComplete is a powerful and robust automated testing tool for mobileweb and desktop  applications. Quickly and easily create accurate and repeatable tests across multiple devices, platforms and environments – regardless of experience level. It supports multiple languages, modern control sets and integrates with open source frameworks and tools like Selenium, SoapUI and Jenkins.

Offer
Learn more about Micro Focus Service Test
Learn more about SmartBear TestComplete
Sample Customers
John Lewis, SEED Infotech, Bajaj Allianz, TMNAS, Hexaware, Brewin Dolphin, A U.S. bankCisco, J.P. Morgan, Boeing, McAfee, EMC, Intuit, and Thomson Reuters.
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Computer Software Company28%
Comms Service Provider11%
Financial Services Firm11%
Manufacturing Company11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company38%
Comms Service Provider8%
K 12 Educational Company Or School6%
Media Company6%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise38%
Large Enterprise48%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business10%
Midsize Enterprise32%
Large Enterprise58%
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, Micro Focus and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: July 2020.
430,585 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.