Compare Micro Focus UFT One vs. Ranorex Studio

Micro Focus UFT One is ranked 4th in Functional Testing Tools with 4 reviews while Ranorex Studio is ranked 11th in Functional Testing Tools with 4 reviews. Micro Focus UFT One is rated 8.6, while Ranorex Studio is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Micro Focus UFT One writes "With regularly occurring application releases, any QA team member can execute tests (regression suites) stored in ALM/Quality Center, let the tests run unattended, and then examine the results". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ranorex Studio writes "Offers a strong suite of tools for application testing of mobile, desktop, and API apps". Micro Focus UFT One is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, SmartBear TestComplete and Micro Focus UFT Developer, whereas Ranorex Studio is most compared with SmartBear TestComplete, Katalon Studio and Micro Focus UFT One. See our Micro Focus UFT One vs. Ranorex Studio report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Micro Focus UFT One Logo
25,414 views|15,957 comparisons
Ranorex Studio Logo
12,732 views|9,415 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus UFT One vs. Ranorex Studio and other solutions. Updated: January 2020.
397,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
UFT has improved our ability to regression test.

Read more »

This is a powerful, reliable and versatile all-around application testing suite.The scalability is very good. It's probably one of the better tools I've seen on the market.Support is very quick. You can write to them and on the same day, they will respond. This is one of the best features.The solutions's regression testing is very important for our company, as is the continuous integration process.

Read more »

Cons
It could work with more browsers other than Internet Explorer, and could better handle new things like Ext JS.

Read more »

For our purposes it requires integration with other products to get out the results in the format we want them. Adding this to the product could improve it.One of the areas the service could be improved would be to have the training in Italian.If there are many queries on the web page, Ranorex will not render the page correctly. I had about 1,000 queries on the page, and the solution was not able to handle it.Binding to other sources is very good but the object recognition in .NET desktop applications often doesn't work.Ranorex is used in Windows while other solutions, for example, Katalon Studio, are cross-platform. (But in my opinion, overall, Ranorex is better).When Ranorex is upgraded, the compatibility with other projects, in version control, in-house or on-premise, fails on occasion. However, overall, the stability is good.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
There are several types of licenses and you need to choose depending on your needs and level of usage.We paid €3,000 (approximately $3,300 USD) for this solution. When you add the runtime licenses it will be €3,500 (approximately $3,900 USD).

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
397,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
4th
Views
25,414
Comparisons
15,957
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
973
Avg. Rating
8.5
11th
Views
12,732
Comparisons
9,415
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
545
Avg. Rating
8.0
Top Comparisons
Compared 19% of the time.
Also Known As
UFT (QTP), Micro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro, QuickTest Professional, HPE UFT (QTP)
Learn
Micro Focus
Ranorex
Overview

QuickTest Professional is now known as Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing, and is an automated testing tool that provides unified AI, GUI, and Business Process testing.

With QuickTest Professional, you can free up IT resources to focus on other areas, while the automated software takes care of all your application software testing requirements. Testing happens continuously and quickly, and so nips any potential issues in the bud. QuickTest Professional saves money and time, and optimizes business productivity and overall user experience.

Ranorex is a leading software development company that offers innovative test automation software. Ranorex makes testing easy, saves time in the testing process and empowers clients to ensure the highest quality of their products. Its flexible tools and quick ROI make it the ideal choice for companies of virtually any size – and this is why thousands of clients in over 60 countries trust in its excellence.

Offer
Learn more about Micro Focus UFT One
Learn more about Ranorex Studio
Sample Customers
CSS Insurance, Revolution IT, Credit Suisse, and General Electric Company.Siemens, TomTom, Adidas, Canon, Lufthansa, Roche, Cisco, Philipps, Dell, Motorola, Toshiba, Citrix, Ericsson, sage, Continental, IBM, Credit Suisse, Vodafone
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm36%
Insurance Company14%
Healthcare Company14%
Retailer14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company38%
Comms Service Provider11%
Financial Services Firm9%
Manufacturing Company8%
REVIEWERS
Software R&D Company27%
Financial Services Firm20%
Manufacturing Company13%
Insurance Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company32%
Comms Service Provider11%
Manufacturing Company9%
Financial Services Firm9%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business16%
Midsize Enterprise16%
Large Enterprise67%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business9%
Midsize Enterprise2%
Large Enterprise89%
REVIEWERS
Small Business26%
Midsize Enterprise33%
Large Enterprise41%
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus UFT One vs. Ranorex Studio and other solutions. Updated: January 2020.
397,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.