Compare Micro Focus UFT One vs. Ranorex Studio

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Micro Focus UFT One Logo
24,236 views|15,640 comparisons
Ranorex Studio Logo
11,374 views|8,503 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus UFT One vs. Ranorex Studio and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
438,944 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The solution has good out-of-the-box protocols.""The production and the efficiency of making your test cases can be very high.""This product is easy to use, understand, and maintain.""UFT has improved our ability to regression test."

More Micro Focus UFT One Pros »

"Code Conversion is one of the great features because sometimes, the automation tool doesn't have the capability of maneuvering around two specific evaluations.""This is a powerful, reliable and versatile all-around application testing suite.""The scalability is very good. It's probably one of the better tools I've seen on the market.""Support is very quick. You can write to them and on the same day, they will respond. This is one of the best features."

More Ranorex Studio Pros »

Cons
"Technical support could be improved.""The price is very high. They should work to lower the costs for their clients.""One of the drawbacks is that mobile performance testing is in need of improvement.""It could work with more browsers other than Internet Explorer, and could better handle new things like Ext JS."

More Micro Focus UFT One Cons »

"The object detection functionality needs to be improved.""For our purposes it requires integration with other products to get out the results in the format we want them. Adding this to the product could improve it.""One of the areas the service could be improved would be to have the training in Italian.""If there are many queries on the web page, Ranorex will not render the page correctly. I had about 1,000 queries on the page, and the solution was not able to handle it."

More Ranorex Studio Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"This solution is quite costly and there is no free trial available."

More Micro Focus UFT One Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The licensing fees depend on the number of users.""There are several types of licenses and you need to choose depending on your needs and level of usage.""We paid €3,000 (approximately $3,300 USD) for this solution. When you add the runtime licenses it will be €3,500 (approximately $3,900 USD)."

More Ranorex Studio Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
438,944 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: If you are looking for advanced use cases for integrating JIRA with other systems, I suggest you look at products like https://zigiwave.com/ Their platform is rich, flexible, and support common use… more »
Top Answer: Definitely OATS is an ideal tool for automation of oracle applications Oracle Fusion is developed using Oracle ADF and the open script has the add-in of Oracle Fusion for Fusion applications.… more »
Top Answer: UFT has improved our ability to regression test.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
3rd
Views
24,236
Comparisons
15,640
Reviews
6
Average Words per Review
830
Avg. Rating
8.5
11th
Views
11,374
Comparisons
8,503
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
547
Avg. Rating
8.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Also Known As
UFT (QTP), Micro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro, QuickTest Professional, HPE UFT (QTP)
Learn
Micro Focus
Ranorex
Overview

QuickTest Professional is now known as Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing, and is an automated testing tool that provides unified AI, GUI, and Business Process testing.

With QuickTest Professional, you can free up IT resources to focus on other areas, while the automated software takes care of all your application software testing requirements. Testing happens continuously and quickly, and so nips any potential issues in the bud. QuickTest Professional saves money and time, and optimizes business productivity and overall user experience.

Ranorex is a leading software development company that offers innovative test automation software. Ranorex makes testing easy, saves time in the testing process and empowers clients to ensure the highest quality of their products. Its flexible tools and quick ROI make it the ideal choice for companies of virtually any size – and this is why thousands of clients in over 60 countries trust in its excellence.

Offer
Learn more about Micro Focus UFT One
Learn more about Ranorex Studio
Sample Customers
CSS Insurance, Revolution IT, Credit Suisse, and General Electric Company.Siemens, TomTom, Adidas, Canon, Lufthansa, Roche, Cisco, Philipps, Dell, Motorola, Toshiba, Citrix, Ericsson, sage, Continental, IBM, Credit Suisse, Vodafone
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm31%
Healthcare Company15%
Insurance Company15%
Retailer12%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company51%
Comms Service Provider10%
Government6%
Insurance Company5%
REVIEWERS
Computer Software Company25%
Financial Services Firm19%
Manufacturing Company19%
Comms Service Provider6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company40%
Comms Service Provider14%
Manufacturing Company6%
Retailer5%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business17%
Midsize Enterprise17%
Large Enterprise67%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business3%
Midsize Enterprise1%
Large Enterprise96%
REVIEWERS
Small Business25%
Midsize Enterprise33%
Large Enterprise43%
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus UFT One vs. Ranorex Studio and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
438,944 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Micro Focus UFT One is ranked 3rd in Functional Testing Tools with 7 reviews while Ranorex Studio is ranked 11th in Functional Testing Tools with 4 reviews. Micro Focus UFT One is rated 8.2, while Ranorex Studio is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Micro Focus UFT One writes "With regularly occurring application releases, any QA team member can execute tests (regression suites) stored in ALM/Quality Center, let the tests run unattended, and then examine the results". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ranorex Studio writes "Offers a strong suite of tools for application testing of mobile, desktop, and API apps". Micro Focus UFT One is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Micro Focus UFT Developer, SmartBear TestComplete, Katalon Studio and Worksoft Certify, whereas Ranorex Studio is most compared with SmartBear TestComplete, Katalon Studio, Tricentis Tosca, Selenium HQ and froglogic Squish. See our Micro Focus UFT One vs. Ranorex Studio report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors, best Mobile App Testing Tools vendors, and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.