We performed a comparison between Microsoft Entra Verified ID and Okta Customer Identity based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Auth0, ForgeRock, Omada and others in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)."I like the Microsoft Authenticator app since it comes with two-factor authentication."
"We primarily use it to manage the community onboarding and offboarding of users, and it's quite a simple solution for that."
"As far as our security team is concerned, the ease of implementing multifactor authentication is definitely the biggest value for our organization."
"The most valuable feature of this solution for most customers is access management."
"It is very seamless."
"We can integrate two-factor authentication with the applications."
"The most valuable features of Okta Customer Identity are there is no infrastructure cost, integrated, has plenty of documentation, and is user-friendly."
"There is no password hash saved on the cloud, which is the part that I like the most."
"The solution has great multifactor authentication."
"I must do two-factor authentication when I sign in from a different location. It creates friction. It's not personalized for the end user. I would like to see specific insights."
"In the future, we'd like to see the product implement more security features, like, for example, zero-trust."
"The product must be provided for free."
"This solution would be improved by adding biometrics features."
"I would like to see the provisioning simplified."
"What I'd like to see improved in Okta Customer Identity is the process of exporting users. Currently, it lacks this feature, and you have to use a third-party tool to export users from the group. Exporting users should be very easy, though I did notice that Okta Customer Identity is being upgraded from time to time, and I've been seeing much improvement in it compared to the previous years."
"Some limitations in scalability. Each application we work with can be completely different, resulting in highly variable implementation processes."
"The initial setup could be easier to do."
"All of the governance functionality and privileged account management could be improved."
Microsoft Entra Verified ID is ranked 7th in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) with 1 review while Okta Customer Identity is ranked 4th in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) with 12 reviews. Microsoft Entra Verified ID is rated 6.0, while Okta Customer Identity is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Microsoft Entra Verified ID writes "Offers single sign-on feature for business applications but needs to offer personalized insights ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Okta Customer Identity writes "Ability to work with a wide range of applications and security mechanisms". Microsoft Entra Verified ID is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, Microsoft Intune, Microsoft Defender for Identity, Auth0 and Microsoft Purview, whereas Okta Customer Identity is most compared with ForgeRock, Microsoft Entra External ID, Auth0, Frontegg and NEVIS nevisIDM.
See our list of best Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) vendors.
We monitor all Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
