We performed a comparison between Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse and Teradata IntelliFlex based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Warehouse solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We can store the data in a data lake for a very low cost."
"The most valuable feature for me is querying."
"I am very satisfied with the customer service/technical support."
"Tools like the BI and SAS are excellent."
"The most valuable feature is the business intelligence (BI) part of it."
"The data transmissions between the data models is the most valuable feature."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is performance."
"We are able to monitor daily jobs, so if there is anything that needs to be done then we can do it."
"The product's scalability is great. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"Intelliflex is very scalable. In fact, scalability has improved 100 times by Intelliflex, in my personal opinion."
"IntelliFlex is easy to scale - one of its best features is that you can upscale it to the size you want."
"It is very stable. It's 100% uptime. Speed and resilience are one of the greatest features of this product. In almost twenty years we've never had downtime, except for outages for patches and upgrades. We've never had a system failure in twenty years."
"The solution's banking model, called FSLDM (Financial Services Logical Data Model), is sophisticated and good."
"The solution is expensive and has room for improvement."
"It needs more compatibility with common BI tools."
"It could offer more development across the solution."
"The feature updates on the on-premise solution come very slowly, and it would be great if they came faster."
"I think that the error messages need to be made more specific."
"SQL installation is pretty tricky. The scalability and customer support also should be improved."
"In the future I would love to see a slightly better automation engine, just for the data integration layer, to make it slightly easier for end-users or junior developers to get involved in incremental updating."
"I would like to see better visualization features."
"The initial setup is complex because there are a lot of factors that come into play, including the amount of software and applications that require access."
"The only issue our company has with Teradata IntelliFlex is that it is not cost-effective because of the way the product has been designed."
"They should add more connectors to different platforms."
"The reporting side wasn't very good in the past, but with the latest versions, it's getting better. Still, the friendliness of the PDC reporting and functionality needs to be improved."
"The solution’s pricing, scalability, and technical support response time could be improved."
More Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse is ranked 8th in Data Warehouse with 32 reviews while Teradata IntelliFlex is ranked 11th in Data Warehouse with 5 reviews. Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse is rated 7.6, while Teradata IntelliFlex is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse writes "An easy to setup tool that allows its users to write stored procedure, making it a scalable product". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Teradata IntelliFlex writes "A tool that provides high performance and speed to its users, along with an exceptional scalability option". Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse is most compared with Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics, Oracle Exadata, SAP BW4HANA, VMware Tanzu Greenplum and Snowflake, whereas Teradata IntelliFlex is most compared with Teradata and Oracle Exadata. See our Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse vs. Teradata IntelliFlex report.
See our list of best Data Warehouse vendors.
We monitor all Data Warehouse reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
