Compare Microsoft Project Server vs. SAP Portfolio and Project Management

Microsoft Project Server is ranked 4th in Project Portfolio Management with 3 reviews while SAP Portfolio and Project Management is ranked 6th in Project Portfolio Management with 1 review. Microsoft Project Server is rated 7.6, while SAP Portfolio and Project Management is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Project Server writes "The division between the onsite work On the cloud of is something valuable. The tech support needs improvement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Portfolio and Project Management writes "The project tracking and dashboards are really useful and deeply valuable for our group". Microsoft Project Server is most compared with JIRA Portfolio, Broadcom Clarity PPM, Planview Enterprise One, Jira and Planisware, whereas SAP Portfolio and Project Management is most compared with Broadcom Clarity PPM, Jira, Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management, Artemis Enterprise and Planview PPM Pro.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Planview, Broadcom, Microsoft and others in Project Portfolio Management. Updated: July 2020.
430,376 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
It has features that cannot be bought by other rivals, so cost does not matter.The licensing was procured before my involvement.

More Microsoft Project Server Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Portfolio Management solutions are best for your needs.
430,376 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
4,722
Comparisons
3,035
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
379
Avg. Rating
7.7
Views
1,820
Comparisons
1,520
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
129
Avg. Rating
10.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 7% of the time.
Also Known As
MS Project ServerPortfolio and Project Management
Learn
Microsoft
SAP
Overview
Microsoft Project Server 2013 is a flexible on-premises solution for project portfolio management (PPM) and everyday work. Team members, project participants, and business decision makers can get started, prioritize project portfolio investments and deliver the intended business value from virtually anywhere. Requires SharePoint 2013, sold separately.Portfolio Management integrates information from existing project management, human resources, and financial systems to provide an overview of the project portfolio with easy drilldown to details for portfolio managers, project managers, and resource managers. This enables innovative and collaborative, cross-functional business processes. Project Management covers the entire range of project management activities in development and consultancy projects, from planning to implementation to project completion.
Offer
Learn more about Microsoft Project Server
Learn more about SAP Portfolio and Project Management
Sample Customers
Magnachip, Gwinnett County Schools, CLEAResult, Medbit Oy, Intelbras S.A., ETS, CORE Construction, Keller FoundationsJoy Global Inc., Citrix, EMC Corporation, Concho Resources, Concho Resources, RZD Russian Railways, Family Dollar Stores Inc., Lenovo
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm38%
Government25%
Manufacturing Company25%
Energy/Utilities Company13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company21%
Government11%
Comms Service Provider9%
Insurance Company9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company37%
Energy/Utilities Company17%
Government11%
Comms Service Provider7%
Find out what your peers are saying about Planview, Broadcom, Microsoft and others in Project Portfolio Management. Updated: July 2020.
430,376 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors and best Project Management Software vendors.

We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.