Most Helpful Review
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
The most valuable features of this solution are dependency management, milestone progress, multiple resource rates, and RAG views.
Dependencies (not typically effectively used in "Agile" techniques) allow understanding of actual project status and challenges.
The project tracking, resource utilization and the cost are the most beneficial aspects of this solution.
I find the planning features the most valuable to me.
They have begun to improve with the new cloud integration.
It's most useful feature is that it interfaces with Project Server so we can, from my perspective, from a portfolio perspective, we can see across the organization.
It is a scalable solution. We have been able to manage larger scale projects easily using this solution.
It is easily adaptable. In addition, it is easily used on mobile applications.
We are able to know what we are doing, how much we have spent, how much time we've taken, and it tells us how much money is left for the project. It also tells us whether we are below or above our expenditures, whether we are below or above our budget.
The key things are managing interactions, resource allocation, resource-leveling (enterprise) and as a collaborative tool, because we use it across multiple projects at a time.
A single place for all our organisation's project records.
Deliverables List: Most useful to enable meaningful status reporting at an enterprise level.
I would like to see the inclusion of multi-currency support.
This solution needs more templates focused on types of projects to ease setup.
There have been some drawbacks with customization. Some users want it to be an automation tool.
I find that MS Project has limited control in comparison to other solutions in the same sphere.
There needs to be better integration with other Microsoft products such as SharePoint, and the like.
Tech support needs improvement.
The scalability is co-dependent on the stability of the product. We have 4000 users, and at times the product is slow.
The packaging of Microsoft Project Professional is pretty simple as a product. But, the end-to-end enterprise is complex.
It may be considered expensive.
In terms of tech support, it took a long time for them to resolve a ticket.
When a lot of users logged onto the site, it took a big toll on the service. Therefore, there is a scalability issue.
Work needs to be done on collaboration with SharePoint.
It has to be more user-friendly. For instance, there should be some assistance, like when you go to certain sites, people pop up and say, "Can we help you? What are you looking for?" It's not interactive enough.
EPM 2010 UI seems a bit dated now that 2016 is available.
Pricing and Cost Advice
You do not have to invest much in terms of configuring this solution to suit your needs.
I do not have personal experience with pricing or licensing of this product.
I am not involved with this.
It has features that cannot be bought by other rivals, so cost does not matter.
The licensing was procured before my involvement.
I think they need more flexibility with licensing, because there are preconceived ideas that don't allow as much flexibility with the various licenses.
out of 76 in Project Management Software
Average Words per Review
out of 24 in Project Portfolio Management
Average Words per Review
Compared 47% of the time.
Compared 30% of the time.
Compared 23% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Also Known As
|Project Pro||MS Project Server|
Microsoft Project helps you get started quickly and execute projects with ease. Built-in templates and familiar scheduling tools help project managers and teams stay productive.
|Microsoft Project Server 2013 is a flexible on-premises solution for project portfolio management (PPM) and everyday work. Team members, project participants, and business decision makers can get started, prioritize project portfolio investments and deliver the intended business value from virtually anywhere. Requires SharePoint 2013, sold separately.|
Learn more about Microsoft Project
Learn more about Microsoft Project Server
|Aston Martin, ABANCA, Airbus Group, Capita, Cardiff University, City of Saskatoon, Intel, Pegasus Airlines, South Australia Power Network (SAPN), Israeli Ministry of Construction and Housing||Magnachip, Gwinnett County Schools, CLEAResult, Medbit Oy, Intelbras S.A., ETS, CORE Construction, Keller Foundations|
No Data Available
Financial Services Firm38%
Financial Services Firm23%