Compare Microsoft Project Server vs. UMT360

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Planview, Microsoft and others in Project Management Software. Updated: April 2021.
479,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"We are on the Flex licenses.""We have unlimited licenses for all of our functionalities. Since we went global, we went with that model.""The cost of other pieces and integrating them in needs improvement.""We have portfolio managers, resource managers, project managers, and time reporting licenses. These are the licenses that we have.""I don't think we have necessarily purchased everything that I would have liked to have seen.""We have several hundred licenses. It costs us several hundred thousand dollars a year.""We overbought our licenses. We looked at our needs three to four years down the road and tried based our contract on that. However, we were over aggressive. We use about a third of the licenses that we have. We're looking to adjust the makeup so we can start utilizing the amount of money that we are spending. Right now, we're overspending, and my organization is not seeing the value in Planview because we are paying so much for licenses that we're not using.""Our licensing costs are probably $150,000 to $180,000 a year with 270 licenses total."

More Planview Enterprise One Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Management Software solutions are best for your needs.
479,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Enterprise One provides a variety of types of resource assignments for assigning work to people. It's very easy and… more »
Top Answer: It would be nice if all of the licenses were FLEX. They've been fairly stable with their pricing over the years.
Top Answer: The resource area needs improvement. The improvements that have been made recently in the later versions have been good… more »
Top Answer: Technical support is very responsive - particularly on critical tickets.
Top Answer: I don't have any experience with the pricing or licensing of the solution. I'm not sure what the costs are. It's not a… more »
Top Answer: When it comes to integration with other systems Project Server falls short. There used to be out-of-box integration with… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Troux
MS Project Server, MS Project Server, MS Project Server, MS Project Server
Learn More
UMT360
Video Not Available
Overview
Planview Enterprise, Planview's performance management platform, combines project and portfolio management software with adaptive best practices. By integrating the business process management of strategies, services, and projects within a single, Web-based solution, Planview empowers organizations to achieve greater levels of control over their ever-changing environment by dynamically managing money, resources, and capacities.
Microsoft Project Server 2013 is a flexible on-premises solution for project portfolio management (PPM) and everyday work. Team members, project participants, and business decision makers can get started, prioritize project portfolio investments and deliver the intended business value from virtually anywhere. Requires SharePoint 2013, sold separately.
UMT360s Enterprise Portfolio Management solutions are helping to fuel a business digitalization revolution being led by CIOs, PMOs, Enterprise Architects and other roles within the enterprise. Theyre integrating investment planning and controls across business and technology portfolios to gain complete financial transparency into all activities and assets consuming scarce resources.
Offer
Learn more about Planview Enterprise One
Learn more about Microsoft Project Server
Learn more about UMT360
Sample Customers
Zurich Insurance Group, Zumbotel Group, Carphone Warehouse
Magnachip, Gwinnett County Schools, CLEAResult, Medbit Oy, Intelbras S.A., ETS, CORE Construction, Keller Foundations
AGCO, Coliban Water, Consolidated Edison, Marquette University, TransAlta, Washington State Department of Licensing
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Insurance Company24%
Financial Services Firm24%
Pharma/Biotech Company11%
Healthcare Company11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company25%
Comms Service Provider13%
Government9%
Financial Services Firm9%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm30%
Manufacturing Company20%
Government20%
Energy/Utilities Company10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company22%
Comms Service Provider18%
Government9%
Financial Services Firm9%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business6%
Midsize Enterprise2%
Large Enterprise92%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business8%
Midsize Enterprise3%
Large Enterprise89%
REVIEWERS
Small Business35%
Midsize Enterprise15%
Large Enterprise50%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Planview, Microsoft and others in Project Management Software. Updated: April 2021.
479,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Microsoft Project Server is ranked 4th in Project Portfolio Management with 6 reviews while UMT360 is ranked 16th in Project Portfolio Management. Microsoft Project Server is rated 8.0, while UMT360 is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Project Server writes "Simple user experience with good usability and accessibility". On the other hand, Microsoft Project Server is most compared with JIRA Portfolio, Broadcom Clarity PPM, SAP Portfolio and Project Management, Planisware and Jira, whereas UMT360 is most compared with Smartsheet.

See our list of best Project Management Software vendors and best Project Portfolio Management vendors.

We monitor all Project Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.