We performed a comparison between Microsoft Purview Communication Compliance and RSA Archer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, AuditBoard, Trend Micro and others in GRC."Microsoft Purview Communication Compliance helps with extra collaboration and ensures communication is within the framework."
"It has the best workload management features."
"The integrated data model of a one-to-many/many-to-one relationship is quite useful."
"I like how Archer requires very little programming ability. A person with minimum coding experience can configure the necessary fields in Archer. It's more of a drag-and-drop solution."
"From my perspective, because I've always done it as a consultant, I do like the way it is configured. They've gone into changing the application builder interface, so it is even easier. When you're working with users, it is really easy to show them how to do things quickly and how to configure, change, and design stuff quickly."
"RSA Archer is a good tool and I have found performing the application, ISMS, and TPRM assessments beneficial."
"Makes auditing much more convenient."
"RSA Archer's best features are advanced workflow, reports, dashboards, and notifications."
"Good dashboards and reporting features; it's easy to gather reports quickly."
"The product should incorporate more automation with the help of AI."
"The bullet chart is the best graph for my purposes, and it should be available for inclusion in the dashboards."
"The technology's a little outdated."
"RSA Archer's best features are advanced workflow, reports, dashboards, and notifications."
"An area for improvement would be the user interface. They could also offer more on-demand applications free of cost."
"Performance could be improved."
"There is no inbuilt alert in Archer to let us know that a data feed has failed or did not run for different reasons. So, we don't even get to know that a feed has not run until somebody reports it to us. This has been a problem all the time. Data feeds have always been a big headache for us because there is no feature to let us know if a feed has not run or has failed. If Archer had a feature to send us an email notification when a feed has failed, it would've been very helpful. This is the reason why our users are slowly moving away to another platform. Some of the modules that I have been managing are being moved to ServiceNow. Next year, a lot of our modules will be moved from RSA Archer to ServiceNow, and the data feed issue has been one of the main reasons."
"The solution can be a little slow due to the Silverlight feature."
"I would like to have the ability to build and maintain an inventory of personal data processing activities and assets utilizing a purpose-built taxonomy and data structure."
Microsoft Purview Communication Compliance is ranked 13th in GRC with 1 review while RSA Archer is ranked 1st in GRC with 38 reviews. Microsoft Purview Communication Compliance is rated 9.0, while RSA Archer is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Purview Communication Compliance writes "Helps with extra collaboration and ensures communication is within the framework". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RSA Archer writes "A rich application with good workflow, but search feature needs improvement". Microsoft Purview Communication Compliance is most compared with Proofpoint Email Protection, Barracuda Email Protection, Mine PrivacyOps, MEGA HOPEX and Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, whereas RSA Archer is most compared with OneTrust GRC, IBM OpenPages, MetricStream, Workiva Wdesk and Snow Governance & Risk.
See our list of best GRC vendors.
We monitor all GRC reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.