We performed a comparison between NGINX Plus and SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure."With NGINX, I appreciate its ability to route traffic geographically."
"Zero Downtime has always been a strength in recommending infrastructure web services. NGINX allows me to execute such infrastructure with less complications and the ability to switch from server to server easily."
"The load balancing module, which is equivalent to LTM, is the focus of the PSE. So far, the features of both are identical. I believe NGINX has more features for securing these services, but in terms of load balancing, both are massive solutions."
"Its most valuable features are load balancing and application delivery. This is the most efficient application for these features because of stability and its efficiency."
"I think installation only took a couple of minutes — no more than 10 minutes."
"The flexibility of its modules allow it to be scalable."
"I need to highlight that the number one thing about NGINX is that it is free."
"Supports IMAP, POP and SMTP protocols for the reverse proxy."
"Workflow functionality and internal portal capabilities are the most important features."
"From the use of this solution, we have been able to establish better processes and have greater management of our company."
"Internal workflow approval around ESS and MSS leave days, capex approval as well as internal communication to the business have improved the way my organization functions."
"They integrated it with the SAP router."
"It would be good if NGINX provided a graphical user interface."
"It would be great if there was even more automation to make it even easier to maintain."
"Make modules easier to enable or disable. The beauty and ugly side of the NGINX modules is you have to know how to compile the module. For beginners or non-very technical aspirant(s) going for NGINX, they have to learn how to compile the modules."
"The KPI should be more focused on load balancing and the latency in application calling from the end system."
"The solution needs to be easier to setup and deploy."
"The drawback is that you must obtain a license for everything."
"I would like it to have a more user-friendly graphical interface."
"The biggest room for improvement would be to allow NGINX Core machines to cluster for memory zones in some way with a plug and play module. "
"Our customers expect that a page will open within one second, and I doubt this will happen. Also, opening documentation takes time. Fixing this will help the customer and help to meet their expectations."
"Due to our business, some setups were very complex."
"We encountered stability issues, especially on external functionality around its RFP capabilities."
"The user interface could be improved by making it more user-friendly."
"External portal functionality with suppliers and customers needs improvement."
More SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
NGINX Plus is ranked 2nd in Application Infrastructure with 27 reviews while SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal is ranked 21st in Application Infrastructure. NGINX Plus is rated 8.8, while SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of NGINX Plus writes "Quick installation and very easy to manage while doing orchestration or automation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal writes "The UI makes the setup easy to do from anywhere". NGINX Plus is most compared with IIS, HAProxy, Kemp LoadMaster, F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) and Apache Web Server, whereas SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal is most compared with Microsoft .NET Framework, Apache Web Server, IBM DataPower Gateway, IBM WebSphere Application Server and IIS.
See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
