Compare Nintex Workflow vs. ProcessMaker

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Camunda BPM Logo
35,334 views|23,059 comparisons
Nintex Workflow Logo
3,717 views|2,548 comparisons
ProcessMaker Logo
347 views|233 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about camunda, Signavio, Pega and others in Business Process Management. Updated: December 2020.
455,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"For an internal project, this is a solution that you can install and have up and running quite quickly.""We are documenting all of the processors and VPN. Then we are sharing it with our business users.""I've found the active community most valuable but it also provides you with a lot of other features.""The number of client implementations and cross-language capabilities to support multiple frameworks is very pluggable compared to Pega. It's also more portable.""The most valuable feature is the ability to share the logic within the rules engine with the business, so you can put it up for everybody to read.""When I compare it with other BPM tools, like IBM, it is great, open source, and free when you use the community version.""The solution is easily compatible with HTML forms and HTML language programming and that is the most significant part.""The speed and execution of DMN was a big selling point for us. It's very good at conducting business processes that are easily modeled and presented in a way that's easy to understand."

More Camunda BPM Pros »

"It has helped us a lot, especially during the initial phase of a project where most of the things are done on paper.""We were able to meet all of the requirements for functionality that were specified, and we did not experience challenges where we had to compromise on functionality.""I really like the visual representation. It actually looks like a flow chart, which is nicer than a SharePoint Designer workflow, which doesn't have that ability.""It has integration with BI and Analytics tools, and RPA toolsets as well."

More Nintex Workflow Pros »

"What I like most is the seamlessness of the workflow capabilities."

More ProcessMaker Pros »

Cons
"The GUI needs to be improved, with more configuration options.""When you search for Camunda BPM resources or books on how to utilize Camunda BPM, it is lacking. When it comes to Alfresco, there are thousands of resources that can help you to utilize within AWS and its Group Services. I would like to see the usage of Camunda BPM on Amazon Web Services be improved.""I would say that Camunda should actually focus on small cases as well. There's a lot of space out there, for small businesses. If they can, they should cater to them.""The user interface needs improvement. It should be more tailored to the end-user and offer a better user experience design over the user interface itself.""I would like to see the forms engine available in the open-source version of this solution.""I would like to have a feature for audit logging, audit logs and audit log management. And some history of use for the audit logs.""I would also like a very easy to use form builder.""Especially when you use the open-source version, there are issues with performance."

More Camunda BPM Cons »

"We are currently facing a lot of issues with Nintex, and we are trying to move away from this solution.""The security features for this solution need to be improved.""Unfortunately, Nintex Workflow is not that stable. We are looking at shifting to another tool.""The solution is a bit too expensive. It could be cheaper.""We would like to design parallel workflows and long-running workflows, along with new features for connecting to cloud-based systems."

More Nintex Workflow Cons »

"This solution only supports basic text, but we would like to be able to insert components such as rich text, graphs, charts, pictures, and other objects."

More ProcessMaker Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"We are using the open-source version of this solution.""Camunda is much cheaper.""I use the open-source free version.""The open-source version of the product is free to use.""The cost of this solution is better than some competing products.""Licensing costs are anywhere from $80,000 to $100,000 USD per year.""We use the open-source version, which can be used at no cost.""I think Camunda BPM can improve their licensing costs. It isn't easy to find clients with Camunda BPM licenses mainly because it's quite expensive."

More Camunda BPM Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The annual support costs are expensive.""Comparatively, it's expensive.""We pay on a yearly basis. It's my understanding that we pay approximately $11,000/year."

More Nintex Workflow Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management solutions are best for your needs.
455,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Hi dear knauf its pleasure to see you in a good position, you were always in the top of specialist. your advise and… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: What I like most is the seamlessness of the workflow capabilities.
Top Answer: This solution only supports basic text, but we would like to be able to insert components such as rich text, graphs… more »
Top Answer: ProcessMaker is an Omnibus-style software. We use it for many of the services within the bank, such as generating a form… more »
Popular Comparisons
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 1% of the time.
Compared 27% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Compared 34% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Also Known As
Nintex Workflow PlatformProcessMaker Workflow Management & BPM, ProcessMaker BPM
Learn
camunda
Nintex
ProcessMaker
Overview

Camunda BPM is a light-weight, open source platform for Business Process Management. It is a perfect match for general software development and provides powerful business-IT-alignment based on BPMN for structured workflows, CMMN for less structured cases and DMN for business rules.

Typical use cases for Camunda BPM are:

  • Straight Through Processing (STP)
  • Human Workflow Management
  • (Dynamic) Case Management
  • Business Rule Automation

At Nintex, our goal is to make work more meaningful by improving business processes. With the Nintex Platform, your organization can manage, automate, and optimize your business processes - all with clicks, not code.

ProcessMaker is an American multinational corporation headquartered in Raleigh-Durham, North Carolina. The company specializes primarily in developing and marketing enterprise business process management (BPM) software. The company also provides customer support, training, and professional services to larger enterprise customers that require highly customized solutions. The company’s flagship Low-Code BPM product is known for its ease of use and ability for deep customization.

Offer
Learn more about Camunda BPM
Learn more about Nintex Workflow
Learn more about ProcessMaker
Sample Customers
AT&T Inc., Allianz Indonesia, Deutsche WertpapierService Bank AG, CSS Insurance, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, VHV Group, freenet Group, Swisscom AG, Zalando SE, AccruentAsiacell, Hawke’s Bay Regional Council, National Metrology Institute of South Africa, Norwegian Olympic Committee, Schnitzer Steel, MT Højgaard, Lippuner Tulsa Community College, Sirius College, Mcredit Vietnam, Oregon City Schools, Lakozy Toyota, HyperCube
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm31%
Comms Service Provider23%
Non Profit15%
Government15%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company30%
Comms Service Provider19%
Financial Services Firm11%
Government6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company28%
Comms Service Provider13%
Government13%
Retailer7%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business52%
Midsize Enterprise17%
Large Enterprise31%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise22%
Large Enterprise64%
REVIEWERS
Small Business21%
Midsize Enterprise14%
Large Enterprise64%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about camunda, Signavio, Pega and others in Business Process Management. Updated: December 2020.
455,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Nintex Workflow is ranked 13th in Business Process Management with 5 reviews while ProcessMaker is ranked 19th in Business Process Management with 1 review. Nintex Workflow is rated 7.8, while ProcessMaker is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Nintex Workflow writes "Reduces time spent on manual processes but did not scale with our usage". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ProcessMaker writes "Easy to learn, automates our manual processes to make things easier, and saves us time and money". Nintex Workflow is most compared with K2, AgilePoint, Pega BPM, Bizagi and ARIS BPM, whereas ProcessMaker is most compared with Bonita, Apache Airflow and Appian.

See our list of best Business Process Management vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.