Compare Objective ECM vs. OpenText Content Suite Platform

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"Both Open Text ECM and IBM File share are expensive."

More OpenText Content Suite Platform Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
476,483 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: Both OpenText ECM and IBM FileNet share are expensive.
Top Answer: Pricing could be improved and the stability or the performance needs improvement, which is very important.
Ranking
Views
892
Comparisons
737
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
10,581
Comparisons
7,587
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
389
Rating
9.0
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Livelink ECM, OpenText ECM, OpenText Content Suite
Learn More
Overview

Objective ECM is a comprehensive suite of modules that connects content to people and the business systems they work with on a daily basis. Designed to maximise user adoption with zero training, Objective ECM delivers a simple, fast and personal experience that can be shared on a vast scale.

OpenText Enterprise Information Management (EIM) technologies and business solutions allow organizations to take full advantage of enterprise information and gain better business insight, create a positive business impact, increase process velocity, reduce risks related to information governance, and protect intellectual property from internal leaks and external threats. OpenText provides solutions in the core EIM categories of ECM, BPM, CEM, Information Exchange, and Discovery.

Offer
Learn more about Objective ECM
Learn more about OpenText Content Suite Platform
Sample Customers
ACT Planning and Land Authority, Australian Department of Defence, Barwon Water, City of Darebin, Delta Electricity, NSW Department of Premier and Cabinet, Health Corporate Network, Hobsons Bay City Council, LandCorp, Port of Brisbane
KUKA Roboter GmbH, MAN Diesel & Turbo, FMC Technologies, Alcatel-Lucent, KHS GmbH, The Black Sea Trade and Development Bank, COMM-UNITY EDV GmbH, BwFuhrparkService GmbH, Swarovski, Hydro One, Viega
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Government34%
Computer Software Company27%
Comms Service Provider11%
Educational Organization4%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company34%
Comms Service Provider15%
Government7%
Energy/Utilities Company5%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business33%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise56%
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Microsoft, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: March 2021.
476,483 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Objective ECM is ranked 19th in Enterprise Content Management while OpenText Content Suite Platform is ranked 5th in Enterprise Content Management with 2 reviews. Objective ECM is rated 0.0, while OpenText Content Suite Platform is rated 9.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Content Suite Platform writes "Scalable, verifies complex solutions, and the support we receive is good". Objective ECM is most compared with SharePoint, Microsoft OneDrive, Micro Focus Content Manager and Atlassian Confluence, whereas OpenText Content Suite Platform is most compared with SharePoint, OpenText Documentum, IBM FileNet, Alfresco and Hyland OnBase.

See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.