We performed a comparison between OpenText Extended ECM and Oracle Content Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management."We also have a module on top of the Content Server called WebReports that has been one of the things that helped us facilitate the workflow and give managers good reporting and visibility into where everything is. Being able to use that on top of the Content Server was a big help."
"Most of our customers are very fond of the upgraded smart user interface."
"The solution's automatic document numbering, state management, and process flow are very useful features to go through the full cycle of the document."
"Being able to search is valuable. Its search is pretty powerful. We are able to search for specific text, and it points us to the document that has that text. That is pretty powerful."
"Retention is useful. I have been pleased with the search functionality and the extensibility for tying it into integrations with other systems and building workflows on top of it."
"WebReports has a lot of capabilities that offer good opportunities to customize the applications the way we want to."
"We can configure the solution with any industry's products per customer requirements."
"Simplicity to roll out, features available, customization options."
"It's a comprehensive solution for managing documents within our organization's management framework."
"When it comes to addressing complex use cases, three or four years ago, we ended up purchasing an additional OpenText product called AppWorks because we started to run into some limitations with the workflow that can be done in Extended ECM. It was a little limiting, so we ended up getting another product."
"We are looking for new, advanced UI features. Currently, the UI does not look great."
"The solution's performance, stability, and consistency could be improved."
"The solution should work better with partners and be more developer-friendly."
"There are no additional features that I would like to see. I am pretty happy with it, but their support could be a bit better."
"The tool's documentation is not proper and has missing information like steps."
"OpenText Extended ECM's user interface could be improved."
"The architecture needs improvement, as it's complex."
"Oracle Content Management poses complexities in initial implementation and configuration."
OpenText Extended ECM is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Content Management with 18 reviews while Oracle Content Management is ranked 11th in Enterprise Content Management with 2 reviews. OpenText Extended ECM is rated 7.8, while Oracle Content Management is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of OpenText Extended ECM writes "Serves as a single source of support for the company but has scalability issues". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Content Management writes "Streamlines document management and enhances collaboration through its robust features and intuitive interface". OpenText Extended ECM is most compared with OpenText Documentum, SharePoint, IBM FileNet, Alfresco and Box, whereas Oracle Content Management is most compared with Oracle WebCenter, SharePoint, Adobe Experience Manager, Microsoft OneDrive and Microsoft Purview Records Management.
See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.