Compare OPNsense vs. Sangfor NGAF

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cisco ASA Firewall Logo
70,051 views|51,086 comparisons
OPNsense Logo
29,655 views|25,795 comparisons
Sangfor NGAF Logo
3,285 views|2,175 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Chirosca Alecsandru
Find out what your peers are saying about OPNsense vs. Sangfor NGAF and other solutions. Updated: November 2020.
446,956 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"It is a comprehensive suite and complete package.""The integration and configuration were pretty straightforward.""The transparency of the single UI to ensure security. A product has to be simple so that an administrator can use it.""It provides security for our company and users.""Among the top features are integrated threat defence and the fact that each virtual appliance is separate so you get great granular control.""Its VPN and ASN features are very stable.""The setup was straightforward. I was happy with the configuration and deployment of the solution, as it was quick.""This solution has good security, and it's a good product. You can trust Cisco, and there's support as well, which is really good."

More Cisco ASA Firewall Pros »

"We can open a new VPN connection easily. It's much easier than with Fortinet in our experience.""I find the solution to be user-friendly. It has a lot of reports and easy settings.""The feature I find most valuable, is that the program helped me to realize all the requested functionality that was needed.""The initial setup is easy. It only takes 15-30 minutes to deploy.""The graphic user interface is very good and it is user-friendly which makes the product easy-to-use.""The solution is good for a basic firewall for a small business or for home use.""The interface and the dashboard are the most valuable features of this solution.""The most valuable features in OPNsense are reporting and visibility."

More OPNsense Pros »

"It seems to be a durable, stable product.""In terms of the most valuable features, the IPS report is quick and updated. Performance is also valuable.""It's a very simple to use product."

More Sangfor NGAF Pros »

Cons
"Cisco ASA should be easier to use. It is a bit tough to navigate and see what is going on.""Even on a smaller scale, people are finding you need HA pairs, and there's no way that the ASA can do that, at least in the virtual version.""The artificial intelligence and machine learning (behavioral based threat detection), which I can this will be coming out in another year, these are what we need now.""The initial setup was complex.""There are always vulnerabilities that come up and there was one in early 2018 but this was patched with software updates.""In terms of next-generation capabilities, Cisco is a little behind, and it is way behind the market leaders.""The phishing emails could be improved.""There may have been one or two incidences of malicious threats."

More Cisco ASA Firewall Cons »

"OPNsense showed me some problems when using it in different environments. The problem is integration with a virtual server.""On the customer-side, because I'm a small business, I need a cheaper or free solution option.""The ability to set the VPN IP address would be a welcome addition.""The solution would not be suitable for anything large-scale.""There should be more technical documentation.""There are issues with stability and reliability.""The only thing that I would like to see improved is the Insight or the NetFlow analysis part. It would be good to have the possibility to dig down on the Insight platform. Right now, we can easily do only a few analyses. If this page becomes more powerful, it surely will be a well-adopted platform."

More OPNsense Cons »

"They need to improve their research team and they need to study their data to analyze it and build the product.""Occasional issues with breaches which are dealt with expediently."

More Sangfor NGAF Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Purchasing from the AWS Marketplace was easy. It was just point and click.""It is pay-as-you-go, so it much cheaper than buying in the plants.""Our individual release cycle has been quicker because the entire development and testing environment has been automated because of these virtual instances. It has aligned our development workflow. This is where we have seen the ROI increase.""With the Cisco ASA, you do get what you pay for. What would really be awesome is to see Cisco blow out a real cheap version where you can use the sandbox, but leave it step-wise and go to another product relatively easily, like getting you hooked on candy.""We are partners with Cisco. They are always one call away, which is good. They know how to keep their customers happy.""Pricing is high, but it is essentially a corporate decision.""Licensing is expensive compared to other solutions.""The cost is a big factor for us. This is why we are using it only in our restricted area. They are very much higher than their competitors in the market."

More Cisco ASA Firewall Pricing and Cost Advice »

"We are not paying any licensing fees. OPNsense is completely free for us.""It costs about $1000.""There are no licensing costs for OPNsence.""OPNsense is open source software so at this time it is free for us to use.""OPNsense is a well known open-source tool.""It is not an expensive product. Basically, I deployed it because it was the fastest solution to satisfy our needs in open source."

More OPNsense Pricing and Cost Advice »

"It costs about 8 to 10 thousand dollars per year for 500 users, standard licensing fees included."

More Sangfor NGAF Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Firewalls solutions are best for your needs.
446,956 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: They provide DDoS protection and multi-factor authentication. That is a good option as it enables work-from-home… more »
Top Answer: In terms of costs, other solutions are more expensive than Cisco. Palo Alto is more expensive than Cisco.
Top Answer: The interface and the dashboard are the most valuable features of this solution.
Top Answer: We are using a free version of the solution.
Top Answer: There should be more technical documentation.
Top Answer: In terms of the most valuable features, the IPS report is quick and updated. Performance is also valuable.
Top Answer: In terms of improvement, it should have integrated consoles. Since we have various products and we need one console that… more »
Popular Comparisons
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Compared 53% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Compared 1% of the time.
Compared 33% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Also Known As
Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Firewall, Cisco ASA NGFW, Cisco ASA, Adaptive Security Appliance, ASA, Cisco Sourcefire Firewalls, Cisco ASAvSangfor NGAF Firewall Platform
Learn
Cisco
OPNsense
Video Not Available
Sangfor
Overview

Cisco ASA firewalls deliver enterprise-class firewall functionality with highly scalable and flexible VPN capabilities to meet diverse needs, from small/branch offices to high performance data centers and service providers. Available in a wide range of models, Cisco ASA can be deployed as a physical or virtual appliance. Flexible VPN capabilities include support for remote access, site-to-site, and clientless VPN. Also, select appliances support clustering for increased performance, VPN load balancing to optimize available resources, advanced high availability configurations, and more.

Cisco ASAv is the virtualized version of the Cisco ASA firewall. Widely deployed in leading private and public clouds, Cisco ASAv is ideal for remote worker and multi-tenant environments. The solution scales up/down to meet performance requirements and high availability provides resilience. Also, Cisco ASAv can deliver micro-segmentation to protect east-west network traffic.

Cisco firewalls provide consistent security policies, enforcement, and protection across all your environments. Unified management for Cisco ASA and FTD/NGFW physical and virtual firewalls is delivered by Cisco Defense Orchestrator (CDO), with cloud logging also available. And with Cisco SecureX included with every Cisco firewall, you gain a cloud-native platform experience that enables greater simplicity, visibility, and efficiency.

Learn more about Cisco’s firewall solutions, including virtual appliances for public and private cloud.

OPNsense is an open source, easy-to-use and easy-to-build FreeBSD based firewall and routing platform. OPNsense includes most of the features available in expensive commercial firewalls, and more in many cases. It brings the rich feature set of commercial offerings with the benefits of open and verifiable sources.

Sangfor Next Generation Firewall (also known as NGAF) is a converged security solution providing protection against advanced threat, malware, viruses, ransomware and web-based attacks using integrated security features like firewall, IPS, anti-virus, anti-malware, APT, URL filtering, Cloud Sandbox, and WAF. As the world's first AI-enabled and fully integrated Next Generation Firewall & Web Application Firewall (WAF), NGAF offering the security visibility, real-time detection and response, simplified operation and maintenance and high-performance application layer security needed to operate an enterprise network in total security. Tested and proven to provide cutting-edge network security by ICSA Labs and endorsed by Gartner Inc., NGAF harnesses the power of Sangfor’s Neural-X threat intelligence and analytics platform and Engine Zero’s innovative malware detection to provide next-generation protection for today’s enterprise.

Offer
Learn more about Cisco ASA Firewall
Learn more about OPNsense
Learn more about Sangfor NGAF
Sample Customers
There are more than one million Adaptive Security Appliances deployed globally. Top customers include First American Financial Corp., Genzyme, Frankfurt Airport, Hansgrohe SE, Rio Olympics, The French Laundry, Rackspace, and City of Tomorrow.CompuNet Systems GmbH,The Ministry of Science, Technology, and Innovation (Indonesia), Lawson, Inc. (Philippines), Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin (Indonesia), TEK Automotive (Italy), etc.
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm19%
Comms Service Provider13%
Manufacturing Company11%
University6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider31%
Computer Software Company24%
Media Company5%
Government5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider44%
Computer Software Company21%
Media Company5%
Retailer5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider51%
Computer Software Company22%
Media Company6%
K 12 Educational Company Or School6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business36%
Midsize Enterprise24%
Large Enterprise40%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business27%
Midsize Enterprise23%
Large Enterprise50%
REVIEWERS
Small Business71%
Midsize Enterprise14%
Large Enterprise14%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about OPNsense vs. Sangfor NGAF and other solutions. Updated: November 2020.
446,956 professionals have used our research since 2012.
OPNsense is ranked 18th in Firewalls with 9 reviews while Sangfor NGAF is ranked 26th in Firewalls with 3 reviews. OPNsense is rated 8.6, while Sangfor NGAF is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of OPNsense writes "Has good performance but I want to see a friendlier user interface". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sangfor NGAF writes "We don't lose data anymore because it protects us from viruses". OPNsense is most compared with pfSense, Untangle NG Firewall, Sophos UTM, Sophos XG and Kerio Control, whereas Sangfor NGAF is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate, Sophos UTM, Sophos XG, Fortinet FortiOS and pfSense. See our OPNsense vs. Sangfor NGAF report.

See our list of best Firewalls vendors.

We monitor all Firewalls reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.