Oracle Access Manager vs PingID comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Oracle Logo
1,000 views|640 comparisons
72% willing to recommend
Ping Identity Logo
2,219 views|1,821 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Oracle Access Manager and PingID based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Access Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Oracle Access Manager vs. PingID Report (Updated: March 2020).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Once it is set up, it is easy to use and it integrates with most of the products on the market.""My company has used most features of Oracle Access Manager for various implementations, but the most helpful feature of the solution for the business and customers is single sign-on.""I would tell others that this solution is reliable. If they are looking for a solution that is reliable and that is scalable, then this is a good one.""Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.""The product allows customization via custom code.""The most valuable features of Oracle Access Manager are the single sign-on capability and is a very robust platform. It can take a high number of authentication, and authorization requests. It's very flexible.""Excellent SSO solution for Oracle products.""The product was built to be scalable."

More Oracle Access Manager Pros →

"What I like best about PingID is that it's very user-friendly. PingID is well-built as a developer tool and regularly upgrades and updates via patches. I also like that PingID has clear documents that will help you integrate it with other solutions.""The solution is stable. We haven't experienced any bugs or glitches.""The only feature we were looking for in PingID was SSO integration with our existing web app.""The mobile biometric authentication option improved user experience. It's always about security because, with two-factor authentication, it's always a separate device verifying the actual user logging in.""The solution has a smooth and configurable user interface for single sign-on capabilities.""This is a user-friendly solution.""It's pretty stable as a product.""I find the auto-discovery feature the most valuable. It helps us automate a lot of things using a single password across applications."

More PingID Pros →

Cons
"The performance of Oracle Access Manager could be improved. It should be quick to install, but it wasn't, so this is another area for improvement. The Oracle Access Manager console also has room for improvement because it's slow.""The mobile access to the solution isn't ideal. They should work to improve its functionality.""In the next release, they should focus more on use cases related to customer access management, customer identity, and access management.""May not integrate easily with non-Oracle products.""Sometimes if a session takes too long, you have to log in again.""The pricing of the solution is in need of improvement. Oracle products are very expensive.""In the next release, I would like to see improvements made to the interface.""There are problems with stability."

More Oracle Access Manager Cons →

"PingID should put a little more effort into making a pretty self-explanatory deck about their tech features and the services they offer.""It has a long way to go until it is a cloud-based solution.""In the beginning, the initial setup was very complex.""The management console needs to be improved. PingID should revise it.""I think that the connection with like Microsoft Word, especially for Office 365, is a weak point that could be improved.""The product is not customizable.""The timing of the token validity, if it could be extended, would be great. I'm not sure if there is even an option to configure these types of settings.""They could use some bio-certification. It's just more user-friendly and more convenient than entering the one time passes. That would be an improvement."

More PingID Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Can be expensive as a solution."
  • "The price is really good and it is flexible because they have CPU licenses. The license is a one-time-only purchase."
  • "On a scale where one is a high price, and ten is a low price, I rate the solution a one. Purchasing a license for the solution is very expensive now."
  • "The product is a little expensive."
  • More Oracle Access Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "PingID pricing is a ten out of ten because it's a little bit cheaper than other tools, such as Okta and ForgeRock, and supports multiple tools."
  • "PingID's pricing is pretty competitive."
  • "The product is costly."
  • "The pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap."
  • More PingID Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Access Management solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The product must improve multi-factor authentication. Multi-factor authentication requires a lot of processes and technicalities. It also involves a lot of costs.
    Top Answer:The mobile biometric authentication option improved user experience. It's always about security because, with two-factor authentication, it's always a separate device verifying the actual user logging… more »
    Top Answer:The pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap.
    Top Answer:The management console needs to be improved. PingID should revise it.
    Ranking
    11th
    out of 37 in Access Management
    Views
    1,000
    Comparisons
    640
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    472
    Rating
    7.4
    7th
    Views
    2,219
    Comparisons
    1,821
    Reviews
    7
    Average Words per Review
    573
    Rating
    8.4
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Ping Identity
    Learn More
    Overview
    Oracle Access Manager delivers risk-aware end-to-end user authentication, single sign-on, and authorization protection, enabling enterprises to secure access from mobile devices and seamlessly integrate social identities with applications.
    IDENTITY DEFINED SECURITY PLATFORM delivers a unified, standards-based platform that can be deployed as SaaS, software or both and can scale to handle millions of identities. From multi-factor authentication and single sign-on to access security, directory and data governance, our capabilities work together to give employees, partners and customers secure access to cloud, mobile and enterprise applications, securing and streamlined everything from sign-on to sign-off and everywhere in between.
    Sample Customers
    SekerBank, University of Melbourne
    Equinix, Land O'Lakes, CDPHP, Box, International SOS, Opower, VSP, Chevron, Truist, Academy of Art University, Northern Air Cargo, Repsol
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Government10%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    REVIEWERS
    Manufacturing Company44%
    Financial Services Firm22%
    Healthcare Company11%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Healthcare Company7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business67%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise24%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise77%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise64%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise74%
    Buyer's Guide
    Oracle Access Manager vs. PingID
    March 2020
    Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Access Manager vs. PingID and other solutions. Updated: March 2020.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Oracle Access Manager is ranked 11th in Access Management with 15 reviews while PingID is ranked 7th in Authentication Systems with 14 reviews. Oracle Access Manager is rated 7.6, while PingID is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Oracle Access Manager writes "A convenient solution that supports customization and provides many features in a single suite". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PingID writes " A robust cloud-based multi-factor solution with a good customer support team". Oracle Access Manager is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity, ForgeRock and F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM), whereas PingID is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, ForgeRock, PingFederate, SailPoint IdentityIQ and RSA SecurID. See our Oracle Access Manager vs. PingID report.

    We monitor all Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.