Compare Oracle Access Manager vs. PingID

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Oracle Access Manager Logo
1,329 views|896 comparisons
PingID Logo
4,551 views|3,481 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Access Manager vs. PingID and other solutions. Updated: March 2020.
447,228 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"Excellent SSO solution for Oracle products.""I would tell others that this solution is reliable. If they are looking for a solution that is reliable and that is scalable, then this is a good one.""The scalability of the solution is good. We haven't felt we've been restricted from expanding as necessary and we haven't heard of any issues from our clients.""In general, the customization that is offered is very good. The company that I am working with currently is using this feature quite extensively.""The product allows customization via custom code.""The product was built to be scalable.""Once it is set up, it is easy to use and it integrates with most of the products on the market."

More Oracle Access Manager Pros »

"I find the auto-discovery feature the most valuable. It helps us automate a lot of things using a single password across applications.""It gets a mobility portal in place in conjunction with Office 365. It provides very good possibilities and it's much better than other technology that we have used before which was unstable and slower.""The soundness of the solution is its most valuable feature. For example, if you are in our corporate network, you can log on without any traffic interfering.""The solution is stable. We haven't experienced any bugs or glitches."

More PingID Pros »

Cons
"May not integrate easily with non-Oracle products.""In the next release, I would like to see improvements made to the interface.""The mobile access to the solution isn't ideal. They should work to improve its functionality.""The pricing of the solution is in need of improvement. Oracle products are very expensive.""The technical support is not very good at all.""The product is complicated and difficult to install and configure.""There are problems with stability.""The initial implementation can definitely be improved because you have to work on several components to configure it correctly."

More Oracle Access Manager Cons »

"It has a long way to go until it is a cloud-based solution.""They could use some bio-certification. It's just more user-friendly and more convenient than entering the one time passes. That would be an improvement.""If the solution is going to compete with Microsoft, they need to offer more unique functionality to keep their current user base.""The solution should allow for better integration with other platforms and the UBT."

More PingID Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Can be expensive as a solution."

More Oracle Access Manager Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Access Management solutions are best for your needs.
447,228 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The product allows customization via custom code.
Top Answer: I'm not in charge of the pricing or things of that nature. However, I am aware that the ministry I'm working with has a special contract with Oracle. They have their own pricing system here.
Top Answer: I think two aspects of this product can be improved. The first is that the product overly complex to install and configure. The second is the reliability of the product. It was not very stable and… more »
Top Answer: Thank you I’m not really interested in being sold to. I’m asking about what works, what doesn’t and pricing models. I don’t want any demos.
Top Answer: The solution is stable. We haven't experienced any bugs or glitches.
Top Answer: We pay a licensing fee to Ping on a yearly basis. We don't have to pay an extra fee for technical support.
Ranking
3rd
out of 28 in Access Management
Views
1,329
Comparisons
896
Reviews
5
Average Words per Review
687
Avg. Rating
7.6
2nd
Views
4,551
Comparisons
3,481
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
311
Avg. Rating
8.5
Popular Comparisons
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 20% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 2% of the time.
Also Known As
Ping Identity
Learn
Oracle
Ping Identity
Overview
Oracle Access Manager delivers risk-aware end-to-end user authentication, single sign-on, and authorization protection, enabling enterprises to secure access from mobile devices and seamlessly integrate social identities with applications.IDENTITY DEFINED SECURITY PLATFORM delivers a unified, standards-based platform that can be deployed as SaaS, software or both and can scale to handle millions of identities. From multi-factor authentication and single sign-on to access security, directory and data governance, our capabilities work together to give employees, partners and customers secure access to cloud, mobile and enterprise applications, securing and streamlined everything from sign-on to sign-off and everywhere in between.
Offer
Learn more about Oracle Access Manager
Learn more about PingID
Sample Customers
SekerBank, University of MelbourneEquinix, Land O'Lakes, CDPHP, Box, International SOS, Opower, VSP, Chevron, Truist, Academy of Art University, Northern Air Cargo, Repsol
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company33%
Government25%
Comms Service Provider15%
Media Company6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company32%
Comms Service Provider12%
Financial Services Firm8%
Insurance Company6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business45%
Midsize Enterprise9%
Large Enterprise45%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Access Manager vs. PingID and other solutions. Updated: March 2020.
447,228 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Oracle Access Manager is ranked 3rd in Access Management with 6 reviews while PingID is ranked 2nd in Authentication Systems with 4 reviews. Oracle Access Manager is rated 7.6, while PingID is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Oracle Access Manager writes "Has the ability to customize it with your own code but is too complex for most uses". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PingID writes "A very sound product that's stable and offers good technical support". Oracle Access Manager is most compared with Okta Workforce Identity, Symantec Siteminder, ForgeRock, Microsoft Azure Active Directory Premium and WSO2 Identity Server, whereas PingID is most compared with Symantec Siteminder, SailPoint IdentityIQ, ForgeRock, Auth0 and WSO2 Identity Server. See our Oracle Access Manager vs. PingID report.

See our list of .

We monitor all Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.