We performed a comparison between Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) and Tungsten RPA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The scalability is great. It's one of the reasons we chose the solution."
"It can integrate with more recent databases like Cassandra, Hadoop, and other more recent Big Data databases."
"The most valuable feature is Data movement."
"The most valuable features of ODI are the ease of development, you can have a template, and you can onboard transfer very quickly. There's a lot of knowledge modules available that we can use. If you want to connect, for example, a Sibyl, SQL, Oracle, or different products, we don't have to develop them from scratch. They are available, but if it's not, we can go into the marketplace and see if there's a connector there. Having the connector available reduces the amount of hard work needed. We only have to put the inputs and outputs. In some of the products, we use there is already integration available for ODI, which is helpful."
"The most valuable features of ODI are the knowledge modules, such as the Loading Knowledge module and the Check Knowledge module, they are helpful. We can check for the constraints in ODI. That helps in figuring out what are the constraints that are the primary keys created in the tables. We can check them with the Check Knowledge module."
"The tool improved our data integration workflow primarily due to its compatibility with Oracle. Its integration makes it very convenient for analytics. Its most valuable feature is robust extended capability. The solution's debugging capabilities are good."
"The installation of the client ODI Studio is easy."
"It is an ETL tool, which does the extract, transform, and load."
"The pricing of the solution is quite good."
"The features that we have found the most valuable are the integration of different third-party support and productivity services."
"It is very simple and easy to learn compared to any other RPA tools such as UiPath, Automation Anywhere and Blue Prism."
"The ability to script information from websites is most valuable. It also seems to be fairly robust and reasonably easy to manage on a server-based deployment. We have a number of robots operating on the central server."
"The product provides end-to-end solutions for different business problems."
"It is stable and scalable."
"The product provided all the security controls that we asked them."
"The solution is scalable."
"The performance of the user interface is in need of improvement."
"Stability could be improved because some operators have issues."
"If you have something like Cisco on top of it, you will have endless problems."
"Overall the product is fine, but sometimes its reports unknown errors while we compile ETL scripts."
"We used a third party to do the implementation of ODI."
"The price needs to be lowered. It's too expensive."
"There are certain things where it can be improved. Initial solution setup seems a bit complex at the start, it should be improved because it becomes bit tough for a novice to get started on this. Sometimes error description is not helpful to understand the problem it gives some generic type of errors which are at times not that helpful to understand the underlying root cause of the issue."
"The solution lacks some functions and features."
"There is really nothing special about the capabilities of this product."
"The solution needs to be scalable."
"This product has room for improvement in support of aviation. The interface could be improved in the next release."
"It needs a free training portal for anybody on the internet to use so that they can get an idea of what the possibilities are."
"We are on version 10.6, and the current version seems to be 11. Kofax is cycling the capabilities of the product very quickly. One of the difficulties has been to actually keep up with the capabilities as they've evolved. On the one hand, it is good that the product is getting better, but on the other hand, it is difficult to implement the best way with a product that is evolving constantly."
"The product needs more AI capabilities."
"I'd like to see a recording function and a more simple interface."
"Kofax RPA needs to improve integration with SAP and Microsoft. The professional services offered by the tool's team is below par. Its licensing needs to be more modular."
Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) is ranked 4th in Data Integration with 67 reviews while Tungsten RPA is ranked 12th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 24 reviews. Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) is rated 8.2, while Tungsten RPA is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) writes "Straightforward to implement, scalable, and has good stability and documentation, but technical support could still be improved". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tungsten RPA writes "A stable product that provides end-to-end solutions for different business problems". Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) is most compared with Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SSIS, Informatica PowerCenter, Azure Data Factory and Oracle GoldenGate, whereas Tungsten RPA is most compared with UiPath, Microsoft Power Automate, Blue Prism, Automation Anywhere (AA) and SAS Data Management. See our Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) vs. Tungsten RPA report.
We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.