Compare Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs. SafeBreach

Palo Alto Networks WildFire is ranked 1st in Advanced Threat Protection with 9 reviews while SafeBreach is ranked 14th in Advanced Threat Protection. Palo Alto Networks WildFire is rated 8.8, while SafeBreach is rated 0. The top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks WildFire writes "Traffic is scanned in a single flow which improves the response times for the user". On the other hand, Palo Alto Networks WildFire is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate, Cisco Firepower NGFW and Cisco ASA NGFW, whereas SafeBreach is most compared with Acalvio, Fireglass and CyberArk PAS.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use SafeBreach? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Check Point, FireEye and others in Advanced Threat Protection. Updated: September 2019.
371,062 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
The licensing fees are on an annual basis, and there are no costs in addition to the standard fees.It's pretty expensive but with respect to value for money, it's okay.It is a reasonable price compared to other solutions on the market.The pricing is OK, it is not too expensive.​More expensive than other firewalls.​It is expensive, a feature more accessible to enterprise class customers, but provides an enhanced possibility that Zero- or near-Zero-day threats may be identified and mitigated. The cost of the product weighed against the potential impact of even one successful crypto malware-type exploit may justify the expense.

Read more »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Advanced Threat Protection solutions are best for your needs.
371,062 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
43,761
Comparisons
36,063
Reviews
8
Average Words per Review
368
Avg. Rating
8.8
Views
692
Comparisons
355
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Top Comparisons
Compared 44% of the time.
Compared 38% of the time.
Compared 19% of the time.
Learn
Palo Alto Networks
SafeBreach
Overview
WildFire™ cloud-based threat analysis service is the industry’s most advanced analysis and prevention engine for highly evasive zero-day exploits and malware. The cloud-based service employs a unique multi-technique approach combining dynamic and static analysis, innovative machine learning techniques, and a groundbreaking bare metal analysis environment to detect and prevent even the most evasive threats.

SafeBreach lightweight simulators play the role of the hacker. Deploy them in critical segments of your network, in the cloud or on your endpoint to simulate the entire kill chain- infiltration, lateral movement and exfiltration. Both network and endpoint simulators are available.

The Safebreach orchestration platform manages and executes the Hacker's Playbook™ of breach methods on our simulators. Our patent-pending technology simulates breach scenarios without impacting users or infrastructure, but while validating the effectiveness of your security solutions. Breach methods are constantly updated by SafeBreach Labs, our team of offensive security researchers.

Offer
Learn more about Palo Alto Networks WildFire
Learn more about SafeBreach
Sample Customers
Novamedia, Nexon Asia Pacific, Lenovo, Samsonite, IOOF, Sinogrid, SanDisk Corporation
Information Not Available
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Government29%
Media Company14%
Financial Services Firm14%
Energy/Utilities Company14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company26%
Comms Service Provider14%
Manufacturing Company8%
Media Company7%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business52%
Midsize Enterprise10%
Large Enterprise38%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business31%
Midsize Enterprise23%
Large Enterprise45%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Check Point, FireEye and others in Advanced Threat Protection. Updated: September 2019.
371,062 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email