We performed a comparison between Parasoft Development Testing Platform and TestRail based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, IDERA, Microsoft and others in Test Management Tools."The most valuable feature is code coverage."
"It really helps developers execute scenarios through DTP and share reports/results across the teams."
"The API to support integration of the homemade automated testing tool."
"I haven't faced any stability issues using the solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"The product’s most valuable feature is the UI. The structure of test cases is easy to understand."
"This is a user friendly solution."
"The feature that I have found most valuable is the dashboard."
"I was on the lookout for automation testing on the browser and I believe this tool is very interesting in that matter. The solution is useful for UI testing. You just need to add the URL that is to be checked."
"The solution is very stable. We've never had any issues with it."
"I use the product to create test cases and share them with my team and manager."
"Parallel execution: It would help it multiple executions could be done at the same time."
"The solution's speed has room for improvement."
"TestRail should improve its pricing."
"I've encountered at some point, some difficulties on the administration side, but I don't remember exactly what they were."
"TestRail by Gurock could improve by adding a defect management module tool. It would add a lot of value if I want to install it and I don't have Jira or an isolating team. For example, if I am providing a service it's separated from the development team, it then would be better to have defect management included with the test management. However, as it is now I need to be integrated with Jira or another defect management tool to complete the testing process."
"Their customer support could be improved. Sometimes we struggle with that. It could be faster. Whenever we raise any query, they get back to you but the turnaround time is very slow."
"With TestRail, the APIs are there, but they may not be able to easily integrate with the Jenkins."
"The reports should be more user-friendly."
"There are a number of improvements that have been requested. While I don't have a list of these requests available, many can be found on Gurock's forum."
"TestRail's user interface is not great. When you use it for the first time, you will be very uncomfortable and not know how to create test cases. It doesn't have a field for preconditions and post-conditions."
Parasoft Development Testing Platform is ranked 18th in Test Management Tools with 4 reviews while TestRail is ranked 2nd in Test Management Tools with 21 reviews. Parasoft Development Testing Platform is rated 8.6, while TestRail is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Parasoft Development Testing Platform writes "Provides 100 percent code coverage, is stable, and scalable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TestRail writes "A tool that provides effective test management and real-time reporting capabilities". Parasoft Development Testing Platform is most compared with Codebeamer, whereas TestRail is most compared with Zephyr Enterprise, Tricentis qTest, TFS, Sealights and Tricentis Tosca.
See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
