Parasoft Development Testing Platform vs TestRail comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Parasoft Logo
81 views|62 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
IDERA Logo
3,564 views|1,637 comparisons
90% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Parasoft Development Testing Platform and TestRail based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, Microsoft, IDERA and others in Test Management Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Test Management Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature is code coverage.""It really helps developers execute scenarios through DTP and share reports/results across the teams."

More Parasoft Development Testing Platform Pros →

"I haven't faced any stability issues using the solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.""The most valuable features are the flexibility, ease of use for writing new test cases, the test plans, and the composition.""I use the product to create test cases and share them with my team and manager.""Integration with Confluence and JIRA.""I was on the lookout for automation testing on the browser and I believe this tool is very interesting in that matter. The solution is useful for UI testing. You just need to add the URL that is to be checked.""Most valuable features are the ease of organizing test cases and a great API for sending results from automated test run results into the database.""The product’s most valuable feature is the UI. The structure of test cases is easy to understand.""I use the solution for test management."

More TestRail Pros →

Cons
"Parallel execution: It would help it multiple executions could be done at the same time.""The solution's speed has room for improvement."

More Parasoft Development Testing Platform Cons →

"It's not easy to create a custom report. It's not straightforward. A good improvement would be if there was a way to report and create a custom report without using a plugin or scripting language.""This solution has room for improvement. For example, some particular projects need to adjust access or add additional members and this isn't always possible. Role-based access would improve this.""I've encountered at some point, some difficulties on the administration side, but I don't remember exactly what they were.""The test suite management has room for improvement as well as better reporting.""It would be useful if it had its own issue management system. At the moment, it's purely a test management tool and you have to link to a defect management tool, like JIRA. It would be useful if there was an option to use its own defect management tool so that it's integrated and not two separate tools.""I have faced some issues with the integration between TestRail and Jira, which haven't been permanently resolved yet.""With TestRail, the APIs are there, but they may not be able to easily integrate with the Jenkins.""It would be nice to have a description section when creating the test scenario itself so I can indicate what the configuration should be."

More TestRail Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Use TestRail Cloud (online TR hosted server) and don't worry about maintenance or scalability. It saves a lot of cash and time."
  • "My advice to others is to shop around for the best deal. Some options out there are free in cyberspace."
  • "Pricing for small teams seems correct with respect to competitors."
  • "Negotiate the best deal you can."
  • "Its price is definitely not more. If they introduce automation, they can charge more."
  • "The price of the solution is based on how many users you have per year. When you grow, it is segmented, For example, 10 to 25, you have a price, and more than 50, or 100, you need to take the enterprise license. I don't think we will reach this point."
  • "I give the price a five out of ten."
  • "The product is not much expensive."
  • More TestRail Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature is code coverage.
    Top Answer:The solution's speed has room for improvement.
    Top Answer:We use the Parasoft Development Testing Platform to verify code coverage for static analysis in our unit tests.
    Top Answer:I use the solution for test management.
    Top Answer:The product has a reasonable price in terms of the features.
    Ranking
    17th
    Views
    81
    Comparisons
    62
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    217
    Rating
    8.0
    3rd
    Views
    3,564
    Comparisons
    1,637
    Reviews
    8
    Average Words per Review
    309
    Rating
    8.4
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Parasoft Concerto, Parasoft DTP
    TestRail by Gurock
    Learn More
    Overview

    Parasoft DTP aggregates the results from across testing practices, providing intelligent and continuous monitoring of the testing outcomes for greater visibility into what is working — and what isn’t.  Includes:

    - Comprehensive Reports & Dashboards

    - Preconfigured compliance reporting

    - Customized Advanced Analytics

    - Interactive Navigation of Results

    - Traceability

    TestRail helps you manage and track your software testing efforts and organize your QA department. Its intuitive web-based user interface makes it easy to create test cases, manage test runs and coordinate your entire testing process.

    Easily track and follow the status of individual tests, milestones and projects with dashboards and activity reports. Get real-time insights into your testing progress and boost productivity with personalized todo lists, filters and email notifications. Efficient test management, get started today!

    Sample Customers
    General Motors, Lockheed Martin, Qualcomm, AAI Textron, Boeing, Fidelity, Johnson & Johnson, CIBC, Penske, Thales, Dell, 
    Apple, Microsoft, Boeing, Intel, NASA, Amazon, HP, Samsung
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company50%
    Recruiting/Hr Firm13%
    University13%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company23%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Healthcare Company7%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business61%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise22%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business28%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise57%
    Buyer's Guide
    Test Management Tools
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, Microsoft, IDERA and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: April 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Parasoft Development Testing Platform is ranked 17th in Test Management Tools with 4 reviews while TestRail is ranked 3rd in Test Management Tools with 21 reviews. Parasoft Development Testing Platform is rated 8.6, while TestRail is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Parasoft Development Testing Platform writes "Provides 100 percent code coverage, is stable, and scalable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TestRail writes "A tool that provides effective test management and real-time reporting capabilities". Parasoft Development Testing Platform is most compared with Codebeamer, whereas TestRail is most compared with Zephyr Enterprise, TFS, Tricentis qTest, Tricentis Tosca and Sealights.

    See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.