Parasoft SOAtest vs. Ranorex

Parasoft SOAtest is ranked 8th in Functional Testing Tools with 11 reviews vs Ranorex which is ranked 10th in Functional Testing Tools with 2 reviews. The top reviewer of Parasoft SOAtest writes "We use the product to test the interfaces of back-end services, simulating different points of sale". The top reviewer of Ranorex writes "We've used it for one of our biggest clients to automate Web (Asp .net, Sharepoint and Silverlight applications) and Desktop (Windows and WPF) applications. But tests fail with minimized browsers". Parasoft SOAtest is most compared with SoapUI Pro, SmartBear TestComplete and SonarQube. Ranorex is most compared with SmartBear TestComplete, UFT (QTP) and froglogic Squish. See our Parasoft SOAtest vs. Ranorex report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Null Product? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Parasoft SOAtest vs. Ranorex and others in Functional Testing Tools.
300,656 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing Parasoft SOAtest vs. Ranorex

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
Parasoft SOAtest has improved the quality of our automated web services, which can be easily implemented through service chaining and service virtualization.We can automate our scenarios in a data driven format, which shows there is no rework on scripts. We only need to update the test data and run for a number of scenarios.If you want something that’s not provided out of the box, then you can write it yourself and integrate it with SOAtest.Automatic testing is the most valuable feature.The testing time is shortened because we generate test data automatically with SOAtest.Every imaginable source in the entire world of information technology can be accessed and used.We do a lot of web services testing and REST services testing. That is the focus of this product.Generating new messages, based on the existing .EDN and .XML messages, is a crucial part or the testing project that I’m currently in.

Read more »

The solutions's regression testing is very important for our company, as is the continuous integration process.Easy integration with CI Tools like Jenkins, TFS, and TeamCity.

Read more »

Read more »

Cons
Reports could be customized and more descriptive according to the user's or company's requirements.Reporting facilities can be better.Compatibility with HTTP 1.1 and TLS 1.2 needs to be improved.During the process of working with SOAtest and building test cases, the .TST files will grow. A negative side effect is that saving your changes takes more time.Enabling/disabling an optional element of an XML request is only possible if a data source (e.g., Excel sheet) is connected to the test. Otherwise, the option is not available at all in the drop-down menu.The feedback that we received from the DevOps of our organization was that the tool was a little heavy from the transformation perspective.Parasoft SOAtest has an internal refresh function where you can refresh the software to show the changes you’ve made in your projects. Unfortunately this function does not work properly, because it often does not show the changes after you’ve hit te refresh button a few times.

Read more »

Binding to other sources is very good but the object recognition in .NET desktop applications often doesn't work.Ranorex is used in Windows while other solutions, for example, Katalon Studio, are cross-platform. (But in my opinion, overall, Ranorex is better).When Ranorex is upgraded, the compatibility with other projects, in version control, in-house or on-premise, fails on occasion. However, overall, the stability is good.Other OS Support, Ranorex Spy performance improvement (Especially for Silverlight controls).

Read more »

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
We are completed satisfied with Parasoft SOAtest. The ROI is more than 95%.The license price is a little expensive, but it provides a better outcome in terms of the end-to-end automation process.It is an expensive product, so think carefully about whether it fits your purposes and is the right tool for you.I think it would be a great step to decrease the price of the licenses.The cost of Parasoft seems to have gotten higher with a projection that wasn't really stipulated for our company. They've done a tremendous job at negotiating those deals.From what I understand, Parasoft SOAtest isn’t the cheapest option. But it has a lot to offer.

Read more »

Information Not Available
Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
300,656 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
10,847
Comparisons
2,754
Reviews
11
Followers
290
Avg. Rating
8.1
Views
21,566
Comparisons
9,343
Reviews
2
Followers
614
Avg. Rating
8.5
Views
0
Comparisons
0
Reviews
1
Followers
1
Avg. Rating
5.0
Top Comparisons
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
See more Parasoft SOAtest competitors »
Compared 25% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
See more Ranorex competitors »
Also Known As
SOAtest
Website/Video
Parasoft
Ranorex
Null Vendor
Overview
Parasoft SOAtest is widely recognized as the leading enterprise-grade solution for API testing and API integrity. Thoroughly test composite applications with robust support for REST and web services, plus an industry-leading 120+ protocols/message types.

Ranorex is a leading software development company that offers innovative test automation software. Ranorex makes testing easy, saves time in the testing process and empowers clients to ensure the highest quality of their products. Its flexible tools and quick ROI make it the ideal choice for companies of virtually any size – and this is why thousands of clients in over 60 countries trust in its excellence.

Information Not Available
OFFER
Learn more about Parasoft SOAtest
Learn more about Ranorex
Learn more about Null Product
Sample Customers
Lufthansa, Siemens, DirecTV, NZ BankSiemens, TomTom, Adidas, Canon, Lufthansa, Roche, Cisco, Philipps, Dell, Motorola, Toshiba, Citrix, Ericsson, sage, Continental, IBM, Credit Suisse, Vodafone
Information Not Available
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm
46%
Government
15%
Insurance Company
8%
Energy/Utilities Company
8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm
45%
Healthcare Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
5%
Government
4%
REVIEWERS
Software R&D Company
31%
Manufacturing Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Insurance Company
8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Manufacturing Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Software R&D Company
13%
Insurance Company
8%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business
19%
Midsize Enterprise
12%
Large Enterprise
69%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
15%
Midsize Enterprise
19%
Large Enterprise
66%
REVIEWERS
Small Business
20%
Midsize Enterprise
37%
Large Enterprise
43%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
10%
Midsize Enterprise
24%
Large Enterprise
66%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Parasoft SOAtest vs. Ranorex and others in Functional Testing Tools.
Download now
300,656 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email