Compare Parasoft SOAtest vs. Ranorex Studio

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Parasoft SOAtest Logo
8,118 views|3,848 comparisons
Ranorex Studio Logo
11,374 views|8,503 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use Parasoft SOAtest? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, Micro Focus and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: August 2020.
437,064 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
They have a feature where they can record traffic and create tests on the report traffic.

More Parasoft SOAtest Pros »

Code Conversion is one of the great features because sometimes, the automation tool doesn't have the capability of maneuvering around two specific evaluations.This is a powerful, reliable and versatile all-around application testing suite.The scalability is very good. It's probably one of the better tools I've seen on the market.Support is very quick. You can write to them and on the same day, they will respond. This is one of the best features.

More Ranorex Studio Pros »

Cons
The product is very slow to start up, and that is a bit of a problem, actually.

More Parasoft SOAtest Cons »

The object detection functionality needs to be improved.For our purposes it requires integration with other products to get out the results in the format we want them. Adding this to the product could improve it.One of the areas the service could be improved would be to have the training in Italian.If there are many queries on the web page, Ranorex will not render the page correctly. I had about 1,000 queries on the page, and the solution was not able to handle it.

More Ranorex Studio Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
They do have a confusing licensing structure.

More Parasoft SOAtest Pricing and Cost Advice »

The licensing fees depend on the number of users.There are several types of licenses and you need to choose depending on your needs and level of usage.We paid €3,000 (approximately $3,300 USD) for this solution. When you add the runtime licenses it will be €3,500 (approximately $3,900 USD).

More Ranorex Studio Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
437,064 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
16th
Views
8,118
Comparisons
3,848
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
625
Avg. Rating
9.0
11th
Views
11,374
Comparisons
8,503
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
547
Avg. Rating
8.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 20% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Also Known As
SOAtest
Learn
Parasoft
Ranorex
Overview
Parasoft SOAtest is widely recognized as the leading enterprise-grade solution for API testing and API integrity. Thoroughly test composite applications with robust support for REST and web services, plus an industry-leading 120+ protocols/message types.

Ranorex is a leading software development company that offers innovative test automation software. Ranorex makes testing easy, saves time in the testing process and empowers clients to ensure the highest quality of their products. Its flexible tools and quick ROI make it the ideal choice for companies of virtually any size – and this is why thousands of clients in over 60 countries trust in its excellence.

Offer
Learn more about Parasoft SOAtest
Learn more about Ranorex Studio
Sample Customers
Lufthansa, Siemens, DirecTV, NZ BankSiemens, TomTom, Adidas, Canon, Lufthansa, Roche, Cisco, Philipps, Dell, Motorola, Toshiba, Citrix, Ericsson, sage, Continental, IBM, Credit Suisse, Vodafone
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm46%
Government15%
Energy/Utilities Company8%
Insurance Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company38%
Comms Service Provider13%
Government9%
Construction Company5%
REVIEWERS
Computer Software Company25%
Financial Services Firm19%
Manufacturing Company19%
Comms Service Provider6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company39%
Comms Service Provider14%
Manufacturing Company6%
Retailer5%
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, Micro Focus and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: August 2020.
437,064 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Parasoft SOAtest is ranked 16th in Functional Testing Tools with 1 review while Ranorex Studio is ranked 11th in Functional Testing Tools with 4 reviews. Parasoft SOAtest is rated 9.0, while Ranorex Studio is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Parasoft SOAtest writes "Creates tests automatically based on recorded traffic". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ranorex Studio writes "Offers a strong suite of tools for application testing of mobile, desktop, and API apps". Parasoft SOAtest is most compared with Postman, SonarQube, SoapUI Pro, Tricentis Tosca and Coverity, whereas Ranorex Studio is most compared with SmartBear TestComplete, Katalon Studio, Tricentis Tosca, Micro Focus UFT One and Selenium HQ.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.