We performed a comparison between Genpact Cora SeQuence and webMethods Integration Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The new reporting and the new dashboard features are really good."
"It is very stable. There is no downtime."
"Some of the key features are the integration platform, query mechanism, message handling within the bus, and the rules engine. We've had a really good experience with webMethods Integration Server."
"The product supports various types of digital documents, including XMLs and EDI."
"Segregation of deployment for the environments is the most valuable feature of the solution."
"webMethods platform is used to build an EAI platform, enabling communication between many internal systems and third-party operators."
"The most valuable feature of the webMethods Integration Server is its reliability. It has a lot of great documentation from the service providers. Additionally, it is easy to use."
"The MFT component of webMethods, for example, is easy to set up and convenient to use. It handles files very efficiently and it is easy to automate tasks with complex schedules. Monitoring is centralized to MWS which can be used to monitor other products as well (Trading Networks, BPM, MFT, etc.)"
"Operationally, I consider the solution to be quite good."
"The most valuable feature of webMethods Integration Server is all the capabilities it provides. We leverage most of the features, that they have offered to us. Our vendor has made some additional features on top of the webMethods Integration Server and we use all the features together."
"The design of the interface, in general, could be improved. It could be a bit more user-friendly."
"The setup and configuration is complex."
"Business monitoring (BAM) needs improvement because the analytics and prediction module very often has performance problems."
"webMethods Integration Server needs to add more adapters."
"The patching of infrastructure is not very smooth and improved authentication should be added in the next feature."
"Other products have been using AI and cloud enhancements, but webMethods Integration Server is still lagging in that key area."
"The orchestration is not as good as it should be."
"I would like to see the price improve."
"The installation process should be simplified for first time users and be made more user-friendly."
"The interface needs some work. It is not very user-friendly."
More webMethods Integration Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Genpact Cora SeQuence is ranked 39th in Business Process Management (BPM) while webMethods Integration Server is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 60 reviews. Genpact Cora SeQuence is rated 8.6, while webMethods Integration Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Genpact Cora SeQuence writes "It is a very stable and scalable product without downtime". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods Integration Server writes "Event-driven with lots of helpful formats, but minimal learning resources available". Genpact Cora SeQuence is most compared with Appian, Tungsten TotalAgility and Hubble, whereas webMethods Integration Server is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, webMethods.io Integration, Mule ESB, TIBCO BusinessWorks and Boomi iPaaS. See our Genpact Cora SeQuence vs. webMethods Integration Server report.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.