Compare Postman vs. Worksoft Certify

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Postman Logo
6,303 views|4,697 comparisons
Worksoft Certify Logo
14,060 views|3,858 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Postman vs. Worksoft Certify and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
441,478 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The most valuable feature of this solution is Collections.""We can also submit requests multiple times and it allows us to capture the response each time by using utility scripts.""The interface and the different types of API methods you can use are the most valuable aspects of this solution.""The variables part is good. We can easily define the variables and we don't have to manually do a change every time, it gets automatically updated.""No coding required.""What is most valuable for me is that we can create and share collections between the team members."

More Postman Pros »

"The ease of use is superior to anything on the market. It's very easy to integrate. We've been very impressed with the tool. Because we primarily use the configuration with SAP, the integration is pretty seamless. But we have used our own in-house VB app as well, and it's worked very well with that.""We love the Capture 2.0 feature. It seems to work very well.""The ability to work with the data, with recordsets, and plug those into the scripts is very easy and very powerful. We use it extensively.""It's script-free, which is really important for our end users because we are usually dealing with colleagues who are not developers and who do not always have the technical background of developing and scripting. It's very useful that there is a nice UI and the tool is script-free.""One big advantage of Worksoft Certify is its integration with SAP Solution Manager...""It is very user-friendly with an appealing UI, unlike a lot of other automation tools that we have evaluated. The fact that it can be used to across SAP and non-SAP applications (including web-based apps) is a big advantage. Using Certify Process Capture functionality has helped in hassle free test design creation, without the need to spend any extra effort to capture test steps and screenshots. The integration elements across HPE ALM and Solution Manager also work well.""If we write a new test that's 80 percent the same as an existing test, it is pretty straightforward to reuse the steps from existing tests for our new tests and build upon them.""It is very easy to maintain. With scripts, I can change one line and in one step. Whatever I want, I can do. I don't need to be an expert to use it."

More Worksoft Certify Pros »

Cons
"I have display issues in my Windows that need to be fixed.""I would like that if you click on one of the fields you should be able to see the entire row of fields, names, and values.""The pricing should be adjusted for the Pro plan.""If we have a certain build on one machine it won't work with another build even if we are using the same URL. It would give us a connection refuse. So developing environment compatibility would make it better.""Could be more user friendly.""An area that needs some improvement would be to allow multiple windows with different collections to be open at the same time."

More Postman Cons »

"In the past, when we've tried to automate some of our web apps, it has not been as robust. If there were one thing that could be improved, it's interaction with web applications. The issue we were running into is that it was harder to identify the objects than it is with some of the other architectured applications.""The definitions for the objects need to be automated. They need to be recognized automatically by Worksoft Certify instead of changing them back and forth manually. This is also something that Worksoft is currently working on.""Our interactions with technical support has not been the best always and there is room for improvement especially with respect to the time taken to respond to cases. However, with the right contacts and reasonable escalations we have always managed to get quick attention on our cases.""One feature that we have been asking for has been to treat tests as code and store the source code for tests in a configuration management tool. Right now, for version control of testing, it's all internally within the tool. If we have a test of a business process and want to revive that test, our methodology now is purely manual work. We go into the tool, create a copy of the existing test, and call the next one: v2. Now, we have two of them and the only way you can tell them apart is by its naming convention.""I would like to see the impact analysis integrated with the performance testing tool. We have multiple tools doing multiple items. I would like to have one common tool.""We are looking for some enhancements on the Capture 2.0 tool. This would give us the ability to control it directly, like we could with Capture 1.0. Right now, Capture 2.0 doesn't really work for our Business Analysts.""There was a change to Capture 2.0. In the end, there have been some challenges with the newer version. Therefore, the company testers, the local ones, do not want to use Capture 2.0.""When it is unstable, there will be times when a test that we are running in Certify will just stop, and it will say, "Aborted." There will be errors. There will be no explanation as to why it happens. It has now happened maybe one out of 20 times. When it happens, I just tell our QA team to stop Certify and restart it, hoping we don't see it again."

More Worksoft Certify Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"We are currently using the free version, but we have plans to buy a license.""We are using the free version that is available."

More Postman Pricing and Cost Advice »

"We would purchase more licenses right now if they were cheaper. Pricing is a little bit of a hindrance.""It is expensive compared to some of the other automation tools in the market. However, the benefits and ROI has proved that it has been a good investment.""The initial upfront cost in terms of licenses, plus all the money that we spent developing tests, has proven it's worth. Now, we can do a regression test suite in ten days as opposed to sixteen weeks.""Our ROI is primarily a reduction in testing time. The testing, when we were doing it manually, was 30 to 40 percent of the project's cost.""We ended up buying too many licenses. They were very good at selling it to us, and probably oversold it a little. We bought 45 licenses and have never used more than twenty. However, they gave us a pretty significant discount on the bigger license, so it made sense for us to buy enough that we wouldn't have to go back and ask for more.""We could use Certify to do robotic process automation, which is basically running a process on your correction system instead of your test system. Therefore, we may do that in the future.""By using automation, it reduced about 75 percent of the time when compared to any other tool.""Saving money and better quality, these are the benefits of Certify."

More Worksoft Certify Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
441,478 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The interface and the different types of API methods you can use are the most valuable aspects of this solution.
Top Answer: We are currently using the free version, but we have plans to buy a license.
Top Answer: The pricing should be adjusted for the Pro plan.
Top Answer: It does allow for good reusability. When it's designed properly and utilized properly, we can put things in a way that allows for reusability, meaning a lot of reuse of VA01, if they're very similar… more »
Top Answer: Looking at it as a product fully packaged, I would like to see more documentation or ease of use of the documentation. Sometimes documentation does exist but we have to search three different sites to… more »
Ranking
7th
out of 10 in API Testing Tools
Views
6,303
Comparisons
4,697
Reviews
6
Average Words per Review
351
Avg. Rating
8.0
2nd
out of 10 in API Testing Tools
Views
14,060
Comparisons
3,858
Reviews
36
Average Words per Review
1,377
Avg. Rating
8.5
Popular Comparisons
Compared 52% of the time.
Compared 21% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Compared 31% of the time.
Compared 24% of the time.
Learn
Postman
Worksoft
Overview

Postman's Tools Support Every Stage of the API Lifecycle. Through design, testing and full production, Postman is there for faster, easier API development - without the chaos.

Worksoft is a leading global provider of automation software for high-velocity business process testing and discovery. Enterprises worldwide use Worksoft intelligent automation to innovate faster, lower technology risk, reduce costs, improve quality, and deeply understand their real end-to-end business processes. Global 5000 companies across all industries choose Worksoft for high speed process discovery and functional testing of digital, web, cloud, mobile, big data, and dozens of enterprise applications, including SAP, Oracle, and Salesforce.com.
Offer
Learn more about Postman
Learn more about Worksoft Certify
Sample Customers
PayPal, Shopify, Microsoft, Adobe, Atlassian, Twitter, BestBuy, CourseraKraft, Reliant Energy, Richemont, Applied Materials, Siemens PLM, Mosaic, Dow Corning, ebay, IBM, Accenture, Fortis BC, US Government, Southwest Airlines
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company42%
Comms Service Provider13%
Media Company7%
K 12 Educational Company Or School5%
REVIEWERS
Manufacturing Company29%
Energy/Utilities Company13%
Consumer Goods Company13%
Logistics Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company46%
Media Company8%
Comms Service Provider7%
Manufacturing Company7%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business38%
Midsize Enterprise25%
Large Enterprise38%
REVIEWERS
Small Business6%
Midsize Enterprise6%
Large Enterprise88%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business10%
Midsize Enterprise10%
Large Enterprise81%
Find out what your peers are saying about Postman vs. Worksoft Certify and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
441,478 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Postman is ranked 7th in API Testing Tools with 6 reviews while Worksoft Certify is ranked 2nd in API Testing Tools with 35 reviews. Postman is rated 8.0, while Worksoft Certify is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Postman writes "We can easily define the variables and it gets automatically updated". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Worksoft Certify writes "Enables us to automate end-to-end testing of our integration between S/4HANA and Salesforce.com". Postman is most compared with Apache JMeter, SoapUI Pro, Parasoft SOAtest, Katalon Studio and Apigee, whereas Worksoft Certify is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Selenium HQ, Micro Focus UFT One, Eggplant Functional and Automation Anywhere (AA). See our Postman vs. Worksoft Certify report.

See our list of best API Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all API Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.