Compare Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs. SecureLink

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use SecureLink? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Cisco, Palo Alto Networks and others in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN. Updated: October 2020.
442,517 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The licensing cost is about 18,000 euros.""This is not an expensive product and everything is included with one license."

More Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Infrastructure VPN solutions are best for your needs.
442,517 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
10,075
Comparisons
7,477
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
394
Avg. Rating
8.5
Views
758
Comparisons
485
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Compared 28% of the time.
Compared 21% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Also Known As
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access, Prisma Access, GlobalProtect, Palo Alto GlobalProtect Mobile Security Manager
Learn
Palo Alto Networks
SecureLink
Overview

Prisma Access provides protection straight from the cloud to make access to the cloud secure. It combines the connectivity and security you need – and delivers it everywhere you need it.

SecureLink is the leader in managing secure third-party remote access and remote support for enterprise organizations and technology vendors. More than 30,000 world-class companies across multiple highly regulated industries, including healthcare, retail, government, financial, legal and gaming, rely on SecureLink’s purpose-built platform to securely control network access, ensure industry compliance, manage audit trails, decrease time to resolution, and reduce liability.

The company was founded in 2003 and is based in Austin, Texas with a second office in Costa Rica.
Offer
Learn more about Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks
Learn more about SecureLink
Sample Customers
Concord Hospital, State of Colorado, Essilor International, RheinLand Versicherungsgruppe, University of Westminster, Universidade Nove de Julho, SPAR Austria, CAME Group, ZipRealty, Greenhill & Co., IKT Agder, Aviva Stadium, Animal Logic, Management & Training Corporation, Brigham Young University Hawaii, School District of ChilliwackNISC, Sotera Wireless, InterSystems, Allscripts, Cerner, Allscripts
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company37%
Comms Service Provider13%
Media Company8%
Manufacturing Company5%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Cisco, Palo Alto Networks and others in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN. Updated: October 2020.
442,517 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 6 reviews while SecureLink is ranked 20th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN. Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks is rated 8.4, while SecureLink is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks writes "Stable with good posture checking and relatively easy to set up". On the other hand, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks is most compared with Zscaler Private Access, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, OpenVPN Access Server, F5 BIG-IP and Check Point Endpoint Remote Access VPN, whereas SecureLink is most compared with Zscaler Private Access, AppGate, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, OpenVPN Access Server and AT&T VPN.

See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.