We performed a comparison between Red Hat Fuse and Sopera Advanced Service Factory based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, MuleSoft, Software AG and others in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)."The process workflow, where we can orchestrate and design the application by defining different routes, is really useful."
"The most valuable feature is the software development environment."
"The installation is quite okay. We don't really change much in the configuration. Most of the time, most of the settings remain with the default and we are able to handle our needs using the default setting."
"With a premium, one can get support 24 hours."
"The stability has been good."
"The most valuable feature is that it's the same as Apache Camel."
"The most valuable part of Fuse is the fact that it's based on Red Hat Apache Camel. It is really good that it already comes with so many different connectors. That makes it relatively easy to use. We use their XML definition to define the routes, making it really easy to define the routing."
"The support training that comes with the product is amazing."
"I have found the best feature are the administrative controls."
"The solution will be discontinued in 2024."
"The main issue with Red Hat Fuse is the outdated and scattered documentation."
"The stability of the solution is an area with a shortcoming that needs to be improved."
"Red Hat Fuse doesn't have a lot of administrative control like other applications."
"The testing part, specifically when running it in the cloud, could be improved. It's a little bit complex, especially considering its cloud nature."
"There is definitely a bit of a learning curve."
"In the next release, I'd like more stability and more security overall."
"What could be improved in Red Hat Fuse is the deployment process because it's still very heavy. It's containerized, but now with Spring Boot and other microservices-related containers, deployment is still very heavy. Red Hat Fuse still has room for improvement in terms of becoming more containerized and more oriented."
"This solution is running on the Eclipse platform and this is where all the designing takes place. The Eclipse performance should be improved. The Open Studio tool we have been using for the development is not up to the industry standard and the performance should be improved."
More Sopera Advanced Service Factory Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Red Hat Fuse is ranked 4th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 23 reviews while Sopera Advanced Service Factory is ranked 18th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB). Red Hat Fuse is rated 8.2, while Sopera Advanced Service Factory is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Red Hat Fuse writes "Configurable, doesn't require much coding, and has an automatic load balancing feature, but its development features need improvement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sopera Advanced Service Factory writes "Functional administrative controls, highly scalable, and reliable". Red Hat Fuse is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM Integration Bus, Oracle Service Bus, WSO2 Enterprise Integrator and JBoss ESB, whereas Sopera Advanced Service Factory is most compared with .
See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
