We performed a comparison between Red Hat Fuse and WSO2 Enterprise Integrator based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The initial setup process is quite straightforward."
"I found it was quite easy to set up and implement."
"The features I found most valuable in Red Hat Fuse are the OSB framework, containerization, and the integration of Apache technologies such as the NQ channel, CXF, etc. These are the features that are very prominent in the solution. Red Hat Fuse also offers flexibility, so it's another valuable characteristic of the solution."
"One of the features I found most valuable in Red Hat Fuse is that it has a lot of containers so you won't have to worry about load balancing. In the past, there was a cut-off, but nowadays, Red Hat Fuse is moving off of that, so my team is utilizing it the most for load balancing, particularly running goal applications and three to five containers. There's automatic load balancing so you won't have to worry too much. I also found that component-wise, you don't have to do much coding in Red Hat Fuse because everything is configurable, for example, XML-based coding. Coding isn't that difficult. Performance-wise, I also found the solution to be quite good and its processing is quite fast. My team is processing a huge amount of data with the help of Red Hat Fuse."
"Because we have been doing Red Hat Fuse projects for three years, and over time we have matured, we can employ similar use cases and make use of accelerators or templates. It gives us an edge when we deliver these services or APIs quickly."
"More than a feature, I would say that the reliability of the platform is the most valuable aspect."
"What I like about Red Hat Fuse is that it's a well-established integration software. I find all aspects of the tool positive."
"The solution has more tooling and options."
"It's a consolidated product. It works and it does its job pretty well."
"The stability is excellent."
"It was mostly easy to set up the product."
"The installation process is easy."
"The drag-and-drop features for connectors are very valuable."
"The solution basically conforms to our standards."
"The solution has two main parts: integration and transformation. It's very user-friendly and easy to understand for everyone."
"WSO2's analytics capability is good, considering the ELC support they provide."
"It might help if, in the documentation, there were a comments section or some kind of community input. I might read a page of documentation and not fully understand everything, or it might not quite answer the question I had. If there were a section associated with it where people could discuss the same topic, that might be helpful because somebody else might have already asked the question that I had."
"There is definitely a bit of a learning curve."
"Red Hat is not easy to learn. You can learn it but you sometimes need external expertise to implement solutions."
"The testing part, specifically when running it in the cloud, could be improved. It's a little bit complex, especially considering its cloud nature."
"Our clients would like to see the user interface improved so that it is more user-friendly."
"While it's a good platform, the pricing is a bit high."
"In the next release, I'd like more stability and more security overall."
"The stability of the solution is an area with a shortcoming that needs to be improved."
"The administration side is complex and could use significant improvements to enhance the solution's functionality."
"One of the reasons that we are looking for a replacement is their way of defining integration. The language of the XML structures that I use to describe the integrations are not that standard, and it's not easy to find people who are familiar with this approach."
"In my opinion, the administration model and interface, of Carbon, are lacking in terms of its features and user experience."
"WSO2 libraries are not mature enough. For example, if you want to integrate with Kafka using its Kafka library, it often has many bugs."
"They should release upgrades more frequently."
"If I have to buy software, then it becomes expensive for me."
"The integration capabilities need to be improved."
"The customization can be a bit difficult."
Red Hat Fuse is ranked 4th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 23 reviews while WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is ranked 7th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 18 reviews. Red Hat Fuse is rated 8.2, while WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Red Hat Fuse writes "Configurable, doesn't require much coding, and has an automatic load balancing feature, but its development features need improvement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WSO2 Enterprise Integrator writes "Consolidated, reliable, and has responsive technical support". Red Hat Fuse is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM Integration Bus, Oracle Service Bus, JBoss ESB and webMethods Integration Server, whereas WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, Oracle Service Bus, webMethods Integration Server, Mule ESB and Talend Open Studio. See our Red Hat Fuse vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator report.
See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.