We performed a comparison between Resolver GRC Suite and RSA Archer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, AuditBoard, Trend Micro and others in GRC."The dashboard is nice. We can provide different levels of access to users based on their titles, privileges, rights, etc. It streamlines the process of auditing and technical compliance."
"Good dashboards and reporting features; it's easy to gather reports quickly."
"Flexible record permissions and data import features."
"Makes auditing much more convenient."
"It has the best workload management features."
"The product is very flexible."
"The most valuable features of RSA Archer are the asset management, risk management, and vendor management."
"Enables development of any application, automation of any workflow including the GRC work processes."
"It has various valuable features. For example, showing us if a control aligns with specific standards or frameworks helps us understand it better and verify its compliance."
"GRC Suite could have better third-party risk assessment. Maybe they can have a module that can perform certain jobs like security incident and vulnerability management because I haven't seen this module on their platform."
"If you need to integrate the RSA products with another SEIM solution, then it doesn't work properly."
"RSA Archer might be a bit expensive for small companies because it's a vast tool."
"An area for improvement would be the user interface. They could also offer more on-demand applications free of cost."
"Archer could be improved by having more customization. I'm not sure if the backend processes have API calls and those kinds of seamless integrations, but from the front, some of the solutions are very out-of-the-box. It's not customizable, so that could be a little problematic since you have to use their features. In terms of the backend structure, I'm not too sure because I'm not a developer—I was an end user and product owner of Archer—and I don't quite know the backend and developmental features. But since it's an out-of-the-box solution, sometimes customization was challenging and support was a little problematic because we had to reach out to them all the time."
"RSA Archer's best features are advanced workflow, reports, dashboards, and notifications."
"The user interface needs work. There are many small text boxes, like credit card size's boxes, where we need to input a lot of text. You can't see what you're typing beyond the tiny window, so you have to scroll or type elsewhere and copy-paste it. It's very inconvenient."
"I would like to have the ability to build and maintain an inventory of personal data processing activities and assets utilizing a purpose-built taxonomy and data structure."
"The first improvement I would suggest for RSA Archer is a better search feature. The search criteria needs to be improved. Sometimes I do a search and the search doesn't return the exact item I'm looking for. RSA Archer could also be improved by being more user-friendly. Maybe I have been using a limited version of RSA Archer, but I'm not sure whether it has ESG, environmental and social governance. In the next couple of years, ESG is the next feature that will be integrated into GRC tools. I would recommend RSA Archer adds ESG."
Earn 20 points
Resolver GRC Suite is ranked 19th in GRC while RSA Archer is ranked 1st in GRC with 38 reviews. Resolver GRC Suite is rated 8.0, while RSA Archer is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Resolver GRC Suite writes "It streamlines the process of auditing and technical compliance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RSA Archer writes "A rich application with good workflow, but search feature needs improvement". Resolver GRC Suite is most compared with , whereas RSA Archer is most compared with OneTrust GRC, IBM OpenPages, MetricStream, Workiva Wdesk and AuditBoard.
See our list of best GRC vendors.
We monitor all GRC reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.