We performed a comparison between RSA SecurID and SailPoint IdentityIQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems."It is a scalable solution."
"One of the most valuable feature is the ID soft token and hard token."
"I think it is really good when it comes to the hard token side of things."
"The most valuable features of RSA SecurID Access are push notifications, multifactor authentication, and ease of integration and deployment."
"I would say that the two-factor authentication and the ease of installation and configuration are the most valuable features of this solution."
"The most valuable features of SailPoint IdentityIQ are the reporting because it is better than other solutions. The workflows can be customized to our requirements and the overall features are good."
"This solution is great for providing control access across your environment."
"The solution is very good at the management of the identity lifecycle."
"Provides good authorization and authentication system functionality."
"The tool's GUI is user-friendly."
"What I like most about SailPoint IdentityIQ is that it's simple to use and easy to configure and deploy."
"I find the built-in connectors, lifecycle management, certification, and recertification features to be the most valuable."
"It offers a single source of truth. Everything can be handled from one tier."
"There are different compliances across the globe; RSA SecurID Access could be more complaint-based."
"The interface needs to improve a lot. It should be easier to manage and navigate."
"Sometimes, we encounter issues with other applications that are not compatible with RSA SecurID Access and require expert troubleshooting. At those times, we need additional support from an implementation perspective. This is an area where Oracle can improve as there is no substitute for reliable and efficient support."
"It doesn't offer an agent-based or reverse-proxy-based approach to integration, which could enhance its flexibility."
"It is too technical. You need really good technical skills in Java and other technologies, which are hard to find. If they can make it easier so that things can be done with a few clicks, it will be great."
"Compared to at least one other product some of the administrative tasks could be easier or more intuitive."
"It allowed to implement the automated processes when a new employee is hired. It allows to have a main central process for new hires."
"Regarding the scope for improvement in the solution, reporting is an area that can be a bit more UI-oriented."
"Needs to focus on automation wherein provisioning of work can be improved and access certification should be automated without the intervention from a manager for approval."
"The report functionality and dashboard of the access manager could be improved."
"If you compare Saviynt and Okta Workforce Identity versus SailPoint IdentityIQ, SailPoint IdentityIQ needs to improve its UI."
"The advanced provisioning features require more improvement."
RSA SecurID is ranked 8th in Authentication Systems with 9 reviews while SailPoint IdentityIQ is ranked 1st in User Provisioning Software with 61 reviews. RSA SecurID is rated 7.8, while SailPoint IdentityIQ is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of RSA SecurID writes "Enhanced security, reliable, helpful technical support, and easy to install". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SailPoint IdentityIQ writes "Flexible, easy to customize, and not too difficult to set up". RSA SecurID is most compared with Yubico YubiKey, Microsoft Entra ID, PingID, Fortinet FortiToken and Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), whereas SailPoint IdentityIQ is most compared with Saviynt, Microsoft Entra ID, One Identity Manager, ForgeRock and Okta Workforce Identity.
We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.