We performed a comparison between SmartBear TestLeft and Tricentis Tosca based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools."The most valuable features are test executor and development."
"We are satisfied with the support of Tricentis."
"To me, what stands out the most about Tricentis Tosca is that even if I'm not a technical tester, I could pick up on how to use it very quickly because of the mechanisms of the tool, for example, its scanning mechanism. I'm not so technical, but I'm able to maneuver through Tricentis Tosca and derive capability. It's a user-friendly tool. It's not very complex."
"The solution is script-less, so you don't need IT knowledge to use the solution in an operational way. This is the most valuable feature. It's also only one of two or three tools that can do good automation on SAP, and in my opinion, it's the best of those."
"You can quickly build automated testing, manage it, and have it run on a regular basis to ensure that there are no issues."
"Image recognition: It has allowed us to automate a GUI section of our product which involves drawing different topologies."
"The mainframe testing and UI automation are the most valuable aspects of the solution."
"The tool's most valuable feature is Tosca Commander."
"The use of automation is most valuable."
"TestLeft captures a lot of space in terms of memory, which is one issue that can be improved."
"It is quite difficult to integrate the solution with other tools."
"What needs to be improved in Tricentis Tosca is its centralized repository mechanism because it's not as flexible. The repository in the solution where you store the data and the script for test automation is quite an old-fashioned mechanism that could be improved."
"I think the downside would be licensing costs which are very high."
"Tricentis Tosca could improve on the ease of use. There is a steep learning curve. The reporting section could be better and some of the new features could be simplified. Additionally, the user management of the client and the server are confusing. There should not be two."
"A disadvantage of Tricentis Tosca is that you have to customize it according to your need, during the early stages of the software, particularly during upstream testing, before system and unit testing."
"In Tosca, I see that there are no user guides."
"The solution is expensive."
"I would like a better user interface."
Earn 20 points
SmartBear TestLeft is ranked 33rd in Functional Testing Tools while Tricentis Tosca is ranked 1st in Functional Testing Tools with 97 reviews. SmartBear TestLeft is rated 7.0, while Tricentis Tosca is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of SmartBear TestLeft writes "Simple to set up and the test execute feature is helpful, but the cost could be reduced". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tricentis Tosca writes "Does not require coding experience to use and comes with productivity and time-saving features ". SmartBear TestLeft is most compared with SmartBear TestComplete, whereas Tricentis Tosca is most compared with OpenText UFT One, Katalon Studio, Worksoft Certify, Postman and SmartBear TestComplete.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.