Compare SmarteSoft Testing Suite vs. Visual Studio Test Professional

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, Micro Focus and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: July 2020.
431,468 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
I think that the pricing is quite good.For the cloud services option, you buy a subscription per account or per user. This costs around $52 a month per person.

More Visual Studio Test Professional Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
431,468 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
38th
Views
105
Comparisons
75
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
9th
Views
3,878
Comparisons
3,147
Reviews
8
Average Words per Review
392
Avg. Rating
8.6
Popular Comparisons
Learn
SmarteSoft
Video Not Available
Microsoft
Overview
SmarteSoft Testing Suite brings a highly extensible integrated quality assurance platform to complement team's quality and productivity efforts, driving improvements in project efficiency, end-user experience and business outcomes. SmarteSoft's patented script-less testing technologies reduce time for test case scripting, testing cycles and let you increase both QA/ALM and production efficiencies. Testing Suites include the following: Functional Testing, Performance Testing, Validation Testing, Regression Testing, ALM & Healthcare.Visual Studio Professional Edition provides an IDE for all supported development languages. As of Visual Studio 2010, the Standard edition was dropped. MSDN support is available as MSDN Essentials or the full MSDN library depending on licensing. It supports XML and XSLT editing, and can create deployment packages that only use ClickOnce and MSI. It includes tools like Server Explorer and integration with Microsoft SQL Server also. Windows Mobile development support was included in Visual Studio 2005 Standard, however, with Visual Studio 2008, it is only available in Professional and higher editions. Windows Phone 7 development support was added to all editions in Visual Studio 2010. Development for Windows Mobile is no longer supported in Visual Studio 2010; it is superseded by Windows Phone 7.
Offer
Learn more about SmarteSoft Testing Suite
Learn more about Visual Studio Test Professional
Sample Customers
Humanitarian Aid Organization, Columbian Financial Group (CFG), Proxibid, Fremont Investment & Loan, Indiana Pension Systems, PoseraTransport for Greater Manchester, Ordina, Bluegarden A/S, CLEAResult, Jet.com, OSIsoft, Australian Taxation Office, BookedOut, Tracasa
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company52%
Comms Service Provider12%
Media Company9%
Insurance Company6%
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, Micro Focus and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: July 2020.
431,468 professionals have used our research since 2012.
SmarteSoft Testing Suite is ranked 38th in Functional Testing Tools while Visual Studio Test Professional is ranked 9th in Functional Testing Tools with 8 reviews. SmarteSoft Testing Suite is rated 0, while Visual Studio Test Professional is rated 8.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visual Studio Test Professional writes "Good integration between the management data and the test cases". SmarteSoft Testing Suite is most compared with Katalon Studio, whereas Visual Studio Test Professional is most compared with Apache JMeter, Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, TFS, Katalon Studio and Ranorex Studio.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.