Compare Sophos Cyberoam UTM vs. Waterfall Security

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, WatchGuard, Sophos and others in Unified Threat Management (UTM). Updated: July 2021.
523,975 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"This is a cost-effective solution compared to other vendors, such as Cisco.""There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees.""It is not cheap.""We paid for a two-year FullGuard license that includes support.""It's not an expensive product.""I am not happy with the pricing, it could be better.""I had an issue when I was trying to stop a user from using too much bandwidth while I was using Azure, I was not able to stop them.""We pay for licensing the solution. It's my understanding that it is not overly expensive. It may be somewhere around $2,000 for a license."

More Sophos Cyberoam UTM Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Unified Threat Management (UTM) solutions are best for your needs.
523,975 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The most valuable feature is the solution is easy to configure for users.
Top Answer: There is a license required for this solution and we are on a three-year contract. I am satisfied with the price.
Top Answer: The implementation policy needs improvment.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
4,926
Comparisons
4,117
Reviews
18
Average Words per Review
412
Rating
7.4
48th
out of 48 in Firewalls
Views
3
Comparisons
2
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Learn More
Overview
Cyberoam Unified Threat Management hardware appliances offer comprehensive security to organizations, ranging from large enterprises to small and branch offices. Multiple security features integrated over a single, Layer 8 Identity-based platform make security simple, yet highly effective.

WATERFALL SECURITY ENHANCES SUPPORT FOR OSISOFT PI
Waterfall Security Solutions Enhances Support For Osisoft Pi and continues to invest in secure IT/OT integration.

Offer
Learn more about Sophos Cyberoam UTM
Learn more about Waterfall Security
Sample Customers
Gulf Corporation for Technology, Maridive & Oil Services, Fidelity Bank, Petra University, Capital FM Kenya, Safari Park Hotel and Casino, Mayfair Casino, Pacific International Lines, Mozambique Ministry of Education, University of Namibia, Royal Hospital for Neuro-disability, University of Hawai, New Delhi Municipal Council
Information Not Available
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Non Profit13%
Manufacturing Company13%
Government10%
Comms Service Provider10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider28%
Computer Software Company22%
Media Company10%
Energy/Utilities Company8%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business41%
Midsize Enterprise43%
Large Enterprise16%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, WatchGuard, Sophos and others in Unified Threat Management (UTM). Updated: July 2021.
523,975 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Sophos Cyberoam UTM is ranked 5th in Unified Threat Management (UTM) with 20 reviews while Waterfall Security is ranked 48th in Firewalls. Sophos Cyberoam UTM is rated 7.4, while Waterfall Security is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Sophos Cyberoam UTM writes "Useful data quota features, but scalability is an issue and the signature database could be enhanced". On the other hand, Sophos Cyberoam UTM is most compared with Sophos XG, Fortinet FortiGate, Cisco ASA Firewall, Sophos UTM and pfSense, whereas Waterfall Security is most compared with .

See our list of .

We monitor all Unified Threat Management (UTM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.