Sophos SafeGuard vs WinMagic SecureDoc comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Sophos Logo
1,030 views|762 comparisons
91% willing to recommend
WinMagic Logo
709 views|592 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Sophos SafeGuard and WinMagic SecureDoc based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, McAfee, Sophos and others in Endpoint Encryption.
To learn more, read our detailed Endpoint Encryption Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"I like its ease of use the most. The management console is really nice. I like having one pane of glass that does everything. It does the Sophos anti-virus and encryption. Everything that you need is in one place. It is easy to use, and it is also pretty fast. It provides some pretty good details, and it lets you know who has access to a file. You can also add additional people to the encrypted documents, which is pretty good. Its stability and performance are also very good.""SafeGuard's best feature is its stability.""It's a straightforward solution.""The solution can block a virus attack and prevent it from moving across the system.""Security-wise, it's one of the best.""The intrusion detection system.""The user interface is simple, It makes it very easy to use.""The user experience and the quality of the features are good."

More Sophos SafeGuard Pros →

"The Central Management server."

More WinMagic SecureDoc Pros →

Cons
"It just needs a little bit more on the reporting side. Its reporting can be improved a little bit in terms of being able to know that things are in the right status. I should be able to pull a report to make sure that everything is all right. It could also have cloud integration. At the time I was using it, it wasn't a cloud product.""Technical support could be a bit better.""The product is not cheap.""In the next release, I would like to see more automation with the endpoint logging, but it's a special feature that is quite complicated to explain.""I would like to see a support-cloud, where Sophos creates a single package that contains all of its products.""Having a DLP integrated with the encryption engine would be very good.""What would make Sophos SafeGuard better than competitors is if its management console also includes firewall management. In the future, I want Sophos SafeGuard to be more scalable.""Once you lock a server, you won't be able to install or put something on that particular server, but on the PC or machines, the lockdown feature is not there, and it is a query our company raised when we had to provide details for Sophos' review."

More Sophos SafeGuard Cons →

"MacOS X is missing features."

More WinMagic SecureDoc Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The licensing costs depend on the series. For example, XG 85 can be around $200. If you go to ACC or to a four or five-year enterprise solution, you will find these devices can cost $10,000. It depends on the series."
  • "Licensing for this solution is on a yearly basis."
  • "The licenses are dependant on the number of users and computers you have to protect."
  • "We have a yearly license with Sophos which is around $1000-$1200 or so per annum. There are no additional costs beyond the standard licensing fee."
  • "Licensing is on a yearly basis and the pricing could be better."
  • "It would be great if the price of the solution was lower than the current price. If we are to sell this particular solution to smaller businesses and not just enterprise businesses it needs to be lower."
  • "We pay around $10 a year for each endpoint, including support."
  • "Pricing for Sophos SafeGuard could be improved because it could reach a thousand dollars depending on the product, edition, and software key purchased."
  • More Sophos SafeGuard Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Licensing and pricing is on par with the market."
  • More WinMagic SecureDoc Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Encryption solutions are best for your needs.
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:It is one of the best products when it comes to stability.
    Top Answer:As a tool, Sophos SafeGuard is not optimized. I suggest that Sophos SafeGuard should be optimized so that it takes less time to provide encryption features to users. I want Sophos SafeGuard to… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    3rd
    out of 28 in Endpoint Encryption
    Views
    1,030
    Comparisons
    762
    Reviews
    10
    Average Words per Review
    438
    Rating
    8.7
    11th
    out of 28 in Endpoint Encryption
    Views
    709
    Comparisons
    592
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    SafeGuard, SafeGuard Encryption
    SecureDoc
    Learn More
    Overview
    Protect your confidential information and comply with regulatory mandates safely and securely with SafeGuard Enterprise, Utimaco's comprehensive modular information protection platform. SafeGuard Enterprise is a modular information protection control platform that enforces policy-based security for PCs and mobile devices across mixed environments. SafeGuard Enterprise offers full transparency to end-users and is easy to administer from a single central console.
    SecureDoc is used by some of the world's largest organizations. By simplifying data security we can help save time and reduce costs associated with security management. At the end of the day, we make data security easy.
    Sample Customers
    Rushmoor Borough Council
    NEC Group,Export Development Canada, SecureDoc University of Guelph, Swiss Bank, Suva (Swiss Accident Insurance), Money Partners (UK), Children's Hospital of Denver, The Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids), Arch Chemicals
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm24%
    Insurance Company12%
    Marketing Services Firm12%
    Computer Software Company12%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Government11%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Government13%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Healthcare Company10%
    University7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business63%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise18%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business34%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise52%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business12%
    Midsize Enterprise22%
    Large Enterprise66%
    Buyer's Guide
    Endpoint Encryption
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, McAfee, Sophos and others in Endpoint Encryption. Updated: April 2024.
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Sophos SafeGuard is ranked 3rd in Endpoint Encryption with 34 reviews while WinMagic SecureDoc is ranked 11th in Endpoint Encryption. Sophos SafeGuard is rated 8.6, while WinMagic SecureDoc is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Sophos SafeGuard writes "Stable solution that preserves data confidentiality". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WinMagic SecureDoc writes "How We Chose SED + WinMagic's SecureDoc For Full Disk Encryption". Sophos SafeGuard is most compared with Microsoft BitLocker, Trend Micro Endpoint Encryption, ESET Endpoint Encryption, Cisco Secure Endpoint and McAfee Complete Data Protection, whereas WinMagic SecureDoc is most compared with Microsoft BitLocker, Symantec Endpoint Encryption and ESET Endpoint Encryption.

    See our list of best Endpoint Encryption vendors and best Mobile Data Protection vendors.

    We monitor all Endpoint Encryption reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.