The dashboard is great.
It's user-friendly so long as you use it frequently.
The product is stable.
You can scale the solution.
Technical support has been good.
The dashboard is great.
It's user-friendly so long as you use it frequently.
The product is stable.
You can scale the solution.
Technical support has been good.
Some production features are lacking. For example, we cannot see any dashboards in the production department. The generation of reports needs to be better. We have sales reports and yet no production reports.
It's a complex initial setup.
It can be an expensive solution.
I've used the solution for six years.
The stability is very, very good. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze.
The scalability is very good. It's very capable.
I've used technical support in the past. They are good.
I did not use a different solution. I use what my company uses in order to get reports.
The initial setup is difficult and complex. It's very complex compared to SQL, for example.
The initial deployment took 15 days, however, nowadays, it takes one or two days. Mostly, I can complete it in one day.
I'm a business consultant. I do implementations for various parts of my customers' organizations.
The licensing is typically chared yearly. It was rather expensive.
We deploy the solution mostly on-premises and sometimes on the cloud. When we use the cloud, we usually use the AWS cloud.
I'd warn new users that it might be difficult the initial time they use it if they are changing their ERP, however,t it'll be very helpful in the future if they're using it frequently.
I'd rate the entire product an eight out of ten. There are other well-known ERPs, such as Salesforce, and companies expect to have the same features. However, not everything may be on SAP, and that's something they need to work on.
Our primary use of SAP HANA is the use of modules, such as Material Management (MM), and Sales and Distribution (SD).
We have found the solution to be customizable and it is beneficial it comes as a bundled package. Additionally, it is user-friendly.
SAP HANA is not perfect and they could improve by having more options and more integration.
I have been using SAP HANA for approximately eight years.
The performance of SAP HANA is very good.
The solution is scalable.
We have a complete team size of approximately 12,000, including all the consulting and project managers.
We have approximately 36 end users, that directly impact the business. We might increase usage in the future but this depends on the business.
I have contacted the technical support from SAP HANA and they are providing a complete solution to customers. I have been satisfied.
The installation is straightforward and took approximately six months.
We used an in-house team to do the implementation.
We pay annually for the license of the solution.
I rate SAP HANA a ten out of ten.
We are solution providers. We are a supply chain organization and we deploy and supply chain solutions for our customers.
We have a host of solutions and for each of our customers based on their environments. We customize their platform and deploy it.
SAP HANA is one of our database endpoints.
It's easy to use, and the Hana Studio is pretty good.
The main issue that we are facing is with the connectors. The JDBC connectors are very slow. We have been trying to connect with our SAP HANA database to our customers.
It's a simple Java driver and there is no proper documentation available anywhere with clear steps. We have to rely on several documents which creates confusion.
The initial setup could be simplified.
Also, we don't have to option to pull up the data from the object structure in SAP HANA. We can only pull up certain objects. It doesn't provide you with a comprehensive list.
There are limitations in connection with SAP HANA. There has to be a better or easier way to connect the databases with other platforms, maybe using Java code or other types of code. It would be very good to have the documentation on how to connect.
I would like to have flexible connecting mechanisms for connection with Java or different types of solutions to SAP HANA on cloud or non-cloud solutions.
They could come up with something similar to the SAP HANA Studio type of modeling.
I would also like to see the capabilities to extend the API. If they had specific APIs, it would be easy for us to connect.
My company has been using SAP HANA for ten years.
We are using the latest version.
It's a stable solution.
It's a scalable solution. Because it's an on-premise infrastructure and SAP this is the best support for most of our customers, scalability is taken care of.
We are an SAP house. We have more than 1,000 people who use this solution.
I have not interacted with the technical support. Other teams may have, but my involvement is more with the integration.
The initial setup was a bit complex. We were told to download it from the marketplace, but when we tried, it didn't work. We may have been doing something wrong, but we did not have a clear understanding of how it should be done. We also had difficulties with the trial version, it was not working.
There are two options:
For testing purposes, if they could provide us with clear documentation, it would be very helpful.
Licensing is on a yearly basis.
We are using the paid version. We pay $200 on a monthly basis.
I am not an expert in HANA. I build the enterprise bus that integrates with SAP HANA as well as other systems. We have built our own integrated platforms.
The recommendation of this solution would depend on the use case and the requirements, and the price will be considered.
I would rate SAP HANA an eight out of ten.
We have an ongoing cloud installation but mostly, we implement on-premises.
We use this solution for SAP Business One.
It's used mainly for analytic purposes, reporting, and the processing of large data.
What I like most are the dashboards and pervasive analytics. Those are the most useful to us.
The documentation can be improved in the future.
In the next release, I would like to see integration with smart devices.
I have been implementing SAP Hana for six years.
We are using the latest version.
It's a stable solution.
SAP HANA is scalable.
We are project-based. In each project, there are anywhere from 30 to 50 users.
We have not really received any technical support from SAP HANA.
I think that's also one thing that maybe SAP would be most helpful, especially if we encounter several errors during installation. We don't get to have many references or we don't get to ask the technical guys of SAP HANA.
Previously we were using MySQL, but due to the fast performance of SAP HANA, we switched approximately three years ago.
In the newer versions, the initial setup is mostly straightforward. However, the older version was more complex. We had several issues with installing.
The installation usually takes approximately four hours.
There are two admins at the most to maintain this solution.
We definitely plan to keep implementing this product in the future and I can recommend it.
I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.
We use SAP HANA as our primary database for our enterprise business. The product is centrally hosted where all our business departments access the product through its sister product SAP ERP.
The product hosts data for the deployed modules namely, Finance and Control (FICO), Materials Management (MM), Plant Maintenance (PM), Production Planning (PP), Quality Management (QM), Human Capital Management (HCM), and Sales and Distribution (SD).
It also hosts the business warehouse (BW)/BI environment.
The performance in terms of processing time is unmatched due to the in-memory processing capability.
The administration of the many records that were previously distributed in different systems into a central location has been made easier. All that information has been availed central from multi-locations without the requirement for manipulation using worksheets, as was the case before.
The database is also running our business warehouse and business intelligence environment, where insightful reports are generated for business management.
Security and performance are the two most valuable features. Our processing time came down to less than two hours from more than ten hours in the legacy system. We use the product to process our small-scale grower payments at the end of the month and whose daily tea deliveries records are in hundreds of thousands.
The audit trails in the HANA product are so robust that one can trace back to the tiny details of what happened at a particular time, who did it, and the time it was done. This makes auditing of both the transactions and performance of the product possible.
The product is very demanding on memory requirements. This is a result of it being an in-memory processing product. The choice of the hardware must be done carefully because when subject to other hardware, it gets slow and just crawls. Memory on the other hand is not cheap because you have to buy it from a third-party.
The cost of the database is not cheap either, as you have to pay for the runtime for any licenses that you purchase, and that comes each year. Now that is punitive with increasing license requirement.
We have been using SAP HANA for six years.
This is a very stable product.
SAP HANA is very scalable.
The customer service is excellent, whereas the technical support is not among the best but we managed.
We used another solution before this one and we switched due to data growth and the need for predictive management.
The initial setup is complex.
SAP itself assisted us with deployment.
Setup and licensing require planning and proper budgeting, as it is not cheap.
We evaluated products by Microsoft and Oracle.
We use the solution to store and migrate the data.
SAP HANA is very flexible and easy to integrate with SaaS components.
The solution could be more flexible. It is challenging to integrate it with third-party tools apart from SaaS components. Also, they should include a feature like local field in the next release.
The solution's workflow system application and functionalities are compatible with SaaS components. I advise others to consider knowing the kind of data validation, performance tool, and use cases per their business requirement. They should look for other solutions if there are multiple data sources involved.
I would rate it nine out of ten.
We are end users of SAP HANA and I'm assistant vice president of our company.
The solution's in-memory computing and the efficient response time are very good features. It's a good solution.
Because SAP HANA is completely in-memory, it requires the use of bigger systems which have a higher amount of RAM. If the system does go down then coming back up is difficult and can take 30 to 40 minutes. It's a big drawback of the solution and one they ought to solve because the multiple downtimes are a problem.
I've been using this solution for six years.
The solution is scalable so if you want to increase your node capabilities, it's very easy to scale out. You just have to add the node and it gets started.
The technical support people are very competent.
The initial setup is straightforward and there were no problems with deployment.
I recommend this solution but running SAP HANA requires deep pockets - it's costly.
I rate this solution eight out of 10.
We always make use of the latest version.
We like that SAP HANA is a new technology. We also like that the product is both vertically and horizontally scalable, allowing us to do around 86 percent compression of documentation from 50 to seven terabytes.
In light of the hosting cost, we find this to be very interesting. We also like the warm and cold data in respect of the solution's technology. There is a real team involved. The customer can initially utilize SAP ECC on the HANA interface and then go on S/4HANA. From this point on, doing upgrades will be very easy and smooth and the risk management will be extremely light.
Since only some accommodation exists, there is a need to enquire of SAP about which environment would be good. While I know the HANA database on the Azure environment comprises a good solution, for example, it does not easily accommodate SAP. HANA is a new technology which only dates back to 2004 and we must give it adequate time before assessing its room for improvement. This is in contrast to DB2, which has been around for 40 years or more years. Perhaps the flow will be improved. As of now, the technology is too new to properly comment on.
The documentation is not an issue and, if anything, a surfeit of it is made available. This is actually one of SAP's stronger points.
Capabilities are also not at issue at present. When it comes to how EAP connects with SAP we are looking at a revolutionary paradigm. For now, we could not ask for there to be more features. This area is wonderful. We find the solution to be very helpful, safe, good and secure. Only with the passage of time will we be afforded a proper understanding of where the technology can be improved.
This said, it would be nice to know when SAP plans to stop its maintenance of a previous version of SAP ECC ERP because, at this point, anyone utilizing SAP will have no choice but to go on S/4HANA Database. This will be contingent on when SAP will stop doing maintenance for the ECC version 6.0.
We saw this with the 4.6 version ECC. Once SAP stopped its maintenance those with SAP were forced to go on the new version.
We have been using SAP HANA for a couple of years.
The solution is secure and stable.
As the solution allows for document compression, I would consider it scalable.
We have had occasion to make use of technical support, although its level varies according to the locale of SAP's global presence.
While I was not personally involved in the installation, my engineers were.
My deployment and maintenance team comprises around seven people, although I could not tell you which percentage of this is made up of managers, administrators and engineers.
A monthly or yearly license must be purchased, although its utility will be based on the cost-benefit analysis that is reached by the individual customer.
The solution is cloud based
I would recommend S/4HANA to other users.
I rate SAP HANA as a nine out of ten.