I'm not aware of any other solution at this company. I've been with the company for just over five years, and this has been the product that we've used.

SolarWinds has a product that you can use for URL monitoring. I used it at home at some point, and it was relatively easy. It was pretty easy to use. It wasn't as big and as bulky as this. Micro Focus SiteScope is a little slow to load when I go to load it up, and it's not as intuitive as some of the other programs, such as SolarWinds.

Use I have used the BMC Truesight , All SiteScope and TrueSight are perfect but TrueSight is better for me in Event Processing , you can create any Event Rule to control and manage the Events but SiteScope easy to use with very good features and capabilities. 

We use a variety of tools and the choice of which to use depends on what our customer requires. If they are looking for a mature tool that fits their budget, we choose products by Micro Focus.

We have also used Gatling, JMeter, Tsung, and Neotys for the performance testing.

About nine years ago, they were changing requirements in what we were doing, so we needed to find a solution that could cover as much that we needed.

Depending on the requirement, we do recommend an agent-based solution. However, our overall first choice is SiteScope.

We decided to use the product because they have many local partners and a very big sales team in Turkey. So, if there is a special need or requirement, they can help us easily. Additionally, we choose it because of the product’s pricing and the quality.

We went away from SiteScope many years ago and came back because of its simplicity. In the interim we switched to some of the IBM product lines. SiteScope is very intuitive and we've been able to accomplish what we want very quickly and efficiently compared to IBM.

It fully depends on the costs, customer, and architect.

We did not have a different solution previously, and at the time we adopted the product we thought that SiteScope was a complete solution. It is not bad, but in the last five years, we learned more about what we might want to see in the product and what is possible with this type of product. As this is the case we are evaluating AppDynamics currently.  

The main reason we are evaluating AppDynamics is because of the capabilities of business transaction tracking through the system. We think that AppDynamics will do this in a more satisfactory way for us and we do not have this feature with SiteScope.  

No