SolidFire Other Solutions Considered

Associate Director, IT at a pharma/biotech company with 501-1,000 employees
We did an extensive evaluation of several products and vendors, looking at SF, Kaminario, Nimble, Pure Storage, EMC, and HPE. Price was a factor, but it was not the only factor. We are not a huge shop, but are growing, so we wanted something that had a solid architecture for now and for later. We wanted it to be as bulletproof as possible, and yet be able to change/grow with us. The more standard, dual-controller-with-1-shelf can survive with a controller failure, or 1+ drive failures, but what about a shelf failure? While this is unlikely, it is still a possibility. With SF, a few minutes after a drive failure, the data (blocks) that were located on that drive are re-duplicated elsewhere. In a very short time (a few minutes), you are fully-protected again. And as long as you have sufficient spare capacity - you can lose an entire node with no data-loss and reportedly only a small performance hit (even software upgrades are non-disruptive, as they are done 1 node at a time). That entire node's data is re-duplicated elsewhere on the remaining nodes. If you don't have a node's worth of spare capacity, that becomes more problematic, of course. What this also means is, as you add nodes, for increases in both capacity and performance, a.k.a. the scale-out model, you also get faster recovery times in case an entire node fails. Adding nodes is a simple as: * Adding a node to the cluster * Adding the drives. Data is re-balanced across the new nodes automatically. Removing/Decommissioning a node is just as easy: * Remove the drives from the cluster * Allow data to be re-located * Remove the node from the cluster There is another unique option. Let's say I grow to 10 nodes, but the LOB application changes, and the role is no longer the same. I can break that into 2 x 5-node arrays and redeploy in different roles. _______ update: since doing the initial review, we have added two additional nodes. Very easy to do, the data re-balancing (distribution) is done automatically. View full review »
Steve Rennick
Enterprise Architect at Ciena
It's all been NetApp products. There's been AFF FAS and then we just thought we would look at SolidFire because we've had such great luck with AFF and FAS for many, many years. We've been a long standing NetApp customer and it just looked like a good solution for us to try, do the proof of concept, and it worked out well for us. We did not consider hybrid storage for this specific use case, but we do have hybrid storage from that NetApp in other parts of our infrastructure. We are also adding some other tiers of storage into this cloud solution, potentially storage grid and potentially some other FAS-type thing for protocol-based access. View full review »
Storage Architect at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
EMC. We considered hybrid storage but they were eliminated because they're a legacy architecture, for most of them; with bolt-ons. And the other ones were dual control or architectures; we are not about scale up anymore. We want scale out. View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, Pure Storage, Dell EMC and others in All-Flash Storage Arrays. Updated: July 2019.
353,012 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Travis Zenk
Senior It Systems Engineer at Billion Automative
We were down between SolidFire before it was acquired by NetApp, so this would be even pre-merger, and our other one was Pure Storage. We chose this solution because of the flexibility to scale out compared to the competitors, such as Pure; along with cost, at almost about a three-to-one cost difference. Operational costs, flexibility. The more nodes you add the more cost it is, but it's definitely significantly cheaper compared to other competitors that are on the market. We did not want to consider hybrid storage because we previously had hybrid storage, and we had problems with our VDI, our virtual infrastructure, to where we wanted to get flash array. All flash was a big deal for us to get to. View full review »
Carl Samuel
System Admin at Niaid
We looked at EMC, we looked at Pure Storage, and we also looked at DDN. And for what we needed to do, none of those vendors fit the bIll. None of those had been there to give us what we needed. We also considered hybrid storage. But SolidFire is a specialized product. For hybrid we can use a fast product line. But SolidFire, it's designed, as far as we see, for a specific use case and that's why we are targeting it for our workload. View full review »
Rahul Ranjan
Software Engineer at Target
There were a couple of them: Hitachi, EMC. But I'm pretty much into NetApp's side of it. View full review »
Senior Manager Of Infrastructure Services at a legal firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
We looked at Texas Memory, we looked at Violin Memory, we looked at XtremIO. All those solutions just didn't compare with what we could do with SolidFire in terms of performance, support, product stability. SolidFire definitely just blew the competition away. View full review »
Steve Kulinski
Senior Storage Administrator at Ensono
We've got quite a few different vendors on our floor today. Just about any vendor, you name them, is on our floor. For the applications, and what we were trying to move towards, the SolidFire seemed to fit every niche we were looking at, for the part we brought it in for. It was a very good product. I don't think we looked at much in the hybrid. SolidFire met all the criteria of what we were looking for, for that part of our infrastructure. View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, Pure Storage, Dell EMC and others in All-Flash Storage Arrays. Updated: July 2019.
353,012 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Sign Up with Email