2020-08-16T11:19:00Z

What are the advantages of all-flash storage over other types of storage?


What are some major benefits of all-flash storage arrays? Why should companies invest in all-flash as opposed to a different storage solution? 

Guest
66 Answers

author avatar
Top 5LeaderboardReal User

It has better performance than Hybrid storage and customers can have more IOPS,
for the mission critical application customers better use all-flash arrayas

2020-11-23T15:29:24Z
author avatar
Top 5LeaderboardReal User

Speed (IOPs), increased reliability, compactness.


If your application does not needs those you can go with legacy solutions as far as price justifies.


Sooner or later even price will be in favour of all-flash

2020-08-20T08:20:46Z
author avatar
Community Manager

Thanks for your input @EGonzalez. What types of storage solutions would you suggest if all-flash is too expensive?

2020-08-23T06:26:01Z
author avatar
User

@Rony_Sklar
We can use Cache tiers with flash disks in part storage pool creation. So that we can get better performance may be not reaches All-flash but better than SAS drives

2020-09-23T04:32:21Z
author avatar
Community Manager

@Krishnamohan Velpuri Thanks for your input :)

2020-09-23T06:20:54Z
author avatar
Top 5LeaderboardReal User

In general, all-flash arrays have much better price/performance (in case if turning on DECO is not slowing down the array - some vendors have this issue, so PoC is needed) than hdd-only or hybrid arrays. Higher performance, lower power consumption per TB. The support cost for the HDD-only and hybrid arrays will be more an more expensive, as the HDDs share is going lower, and the main R&D is moved to all-flash arrays. Of course, in some cases (i.e. video surveillance, D2D and maybe several others), HDD-only arrays are the better option, so it's better to make a decision case-by-case.

2020-08-17T08:02:42Z
author avatar
Top 10Real User

It all depends on the Budget as well....if required High IOPs for Database or other read/write intensive services and also budget is not a issue then go for All Flash...Otherwise combining SSD with NL-SAS alongwith tiering / cache features will suffice purpose in most conditions...

2021-02-08T08:42:16Z
author avatar
Top 5Real User

The selection of All-Flash Storage Solutions depends on requirements and the goal any customer is looking to achieve at the end.


All-Flash is not a fit for all requirements......


"If a customer needs a storage solution with high to extreme performance,
Rack-space
efficient, power and cooling efficient (environmentally friendly),
build-in compression; then they should choose All-Flash solutions."


It is not all about the performance that storage manufacturers are very aggressive to sell their All-Flash boxes.


Just think about SAS disks..... those were used as performance and SATA as capacity.


Enterprise SAS disk technology is limited to 1.8TB/disk only; that is why storage manufacturers are promoting their All-Flash to fill the capacity gap created because of SAS disks technology limitations.


The modern Flash disks are covering both requirements (Capacity+Performance) but are still expensive (if we assume the same RAW capacity).


If a customer comes with the requirements that fits to an Enterprise Hybrid Storage solution like 40%SSD, 30%SAS and 30%SATA; 400TB RAW in total, then they should select All-Flash instead, as both solutions will not have any significant cost differences.


If a customer's requirements (Performance+Capacity+Cost-effective) fits to SAS then they should choose a SAS based storage solution.


If a customer needs an archival storage then they should choose SATA based solutions.


If a customer needs a storage solution with high to extreme performance, Rack-space, power and cooling efficient (environmentally friendly), build-in compression, then they should choose All-Flash solutions.


If customer needs less SSDs/Flash disks; like.... 10%SSD+45%SAS+45%SATA, then Hybrid type of storage solutions will be a good and cost-effective option.

2020-12-28T10:18:46Z
author avatar
User

All-flash arrays are more costlier than any other storage arrays.
Will give more performance with less latency when compared to any other arrays

2020-09-23T04:29:04Z
author avatar
Community Manager

@Krishnamohan Velpuri Do the benefits of performance with less latency justify the cost of all-flash?

2020-09-24T07:52:58Z
author avatar
User

@Rony_Sklar Of course, its costly. If performance required.
More money = more performance  as of now. May be in future we may get for less price.
It depends, if customer can bare and if they defiantly need less latency for there applications.

2020-09-24T08:27:33Z
Find out what your peers are saying about Pure Storage, NetApp, Dell EMC and others in All-Flash Storage Arrays. Updated: February 2021.
465,339 professionals have used our research since 2012.