From the IP end and from ArchSight from HP, I think that Splunk works out very good for me. Not 100%, but 80%. IBM has a lot of features not familiar to the user and the support is very bad. ArcSight thas support, but they forget they have small issues. So, we use Splunk because it is the pinnacle of the organizations. We have specificity. We don't want any kind of application that can corrupt all our data. So we use the Splunk because we see more admirable organizations using it. So we share the knowledge with them.

Splunk User Behavior Analytics is a stable product.

Splunk hasn't gone down since we started using it. 

It's stable. I used to deal with other vendors in the UBA such as HP ArcSight, which is a bit more sophisticated and complicated in terms of configuration and in terms of monitoring. Splunk is much easier and very straightforward in terms of configuration and monitoring and customization as well.

We don't generate enough data to know whether it's reliable or not.

That said, with the small usage that we do utilize, it's pretty stable.

The solution is stable. 

It's been very stable so far in its core. The company's been great.

The solution, from what I have witnessed, is stable. There aren't bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. A company can rely on its performance.

I think the solution is very stable.

It is fairly stable.

It's a stable, reliable product with good performance. There aren't bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. 

The solution is very stable; it's very good.

The stability is good. It's reliable and can be used in enterprise environments. 

Everything that Splunk does is great, as far as stability.

It is very stable.

It is stable.