We're transaction-based, as far as our licensing goes. We have 50,000 task a month and our licensing cost is $55,000 a year, if I remember correctly. There are no additional costs. Support is included in that.

At the time, Stonebranch was about 30 to 35 percent of the cost of Automic. Because we also run IBM Sterling File Gateway, and we run IBM WebSphere and IBM middleware for our applications, we looked at the IBM Tivoli solution but it was just cost-prohibitive.

The price of the solution is at a medium level compared to the competition.

I rate the price of Stonebranch Universal Automation Center a four out of five.

The pricing is good. I would rate it eight out of ten. The pricing is similar to AutoSys. It's lower than Redwood, which was on the higher side in terms of pricing. 

There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees.

Outside of licensing fees, there aren't any other costs.

When we reviewed this solution against other vendors, Stonebranch blew everybody out of the water in terms of cost.

There is a maintenance cost that is required every year.

Stonebranch is cheaper than Control-M, so many companies are using Stonebranch.

The license is paid every year.

I am not aware of the cost.

I don't have pricing information, but I do know it's cheaper than our old legacy system. Other than the standard licensing fees there are no additional costs.

Pricing is very comparable to other tools in the market.

for sure unlimited license

The pricing of this product, compared to competitors is great. There is a general ease of set up for agents on all systems (except the mainframe which can be a little trickier).

Choose an enterprise license to have unlimited agents, tasks, etc.

I'm very much pleased with the setup process or installation process, and licensing. 

Found it to be reasonable and worth the investment.

The pricing is quite reasonable. We found the cost to be surprisingly good.