How would you compare Stonebranch Universal Automation Center vs Control-M?

We performed a comparison between Control-M and Stonebranch Universal Automation Center based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below. Features: Control-M offers a range of valuable capabilities such as Managed File Transfer, credentials vault, integration capabilities, Role-Based Administration, file transfer integration, collaboration, scheduling, ease of configuration, web interface, reporting, workload archiving,...

Download Control-M vs. Stonebranch comparison Report Read more

Related Q&As

Aug 16, 2023

Can Control-M emulate all the functionalities of TWS in a distributed environment?

Jul 6, 2023

Can Control-M's Application Integrator track job status and retrieve output for executing steps, especially in the context of custom integrations?

Hi Doug, I am looking at the same, or at least a very similar issue. Have a customer who is leaving z/OS on which he is using IWS to go to Linux, and the question now is whether to pick up IWS (TWS) distributed or go for Control-M. Having posed this question to some colleagues - their response was to actually go with Stonebranch instead, if nothing else because it is some 35% cheaper than the above 2 contenders, and covers much the same "stools" - so I am now concentrating on that. Will keep you informed of the outcome if that is of interest,

How would you compare Stonebranch Universal Automation Center vs Control-M?

1 Answer

Related Q&As

Related articles