OpenText vs SWIFT

Unbiased reviews from our professional community. A complete perspective on vendors based on user input.
OpenText
Based on 25 reviews.
SWIFT
Based on 1 review.
Top Comparisons
Overview
US$ $1,624. million OpenText software applications manage content or unstructured data for most types of governance, efficiency and monetization requirements in large companies, government agencies and professional service firms. OpenText solutions are aimed at addressing information management requirements, including the management of large volumes of content, compliance with regulatory requirements, and mobile and online experience management.The Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication provides a network that enables financial institutions worldwide to send and receive information about financial transactions in a secure, standardized and reliable environment. SWIFT also sells software and services to financial institutions, much of it for use on the SWIFTNet Network, and ISO 9362. Business Identifier Codes are popularly known as "SWIFT codes".
Sample Customers
Cordys Business Operations Platform: Nationwide, Delta Technology, Export Development Canada, Rompetrol, Salt River Project
SWIFTnet FIN: Alcatel-Lucent, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Canadian National Railway, General Electric Company, Huawei, Novartis International, Standard Bank, UniCredit, Volvo
SWIFT InterAct: Seceti
Popular Solutions
Top Industries
Software R&D Company
43%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Insurance Company
5%
Government
5%
No Data Available
Quotes From Member Reviews
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Most Helpful Reviews
Review 1 of 5
Review 1 of 1
Customer Service
Review 1 of 17
Review 1 of 1
Technical Support
No Data Available
No Data Available
We monitor all reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.