Sage vs SugarCRM

Unbiased reviews from our professional community. A complete perspective on vendors based on user input.
Sage
Based on 37 reviews.
SugarCRM
Based on 11 reviews.
Latest Research
Overview
The Sage Group plc, commonly known as Sage, is a multinational enterprise software company headquartered in Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom. It is the world's third-largest supplier of enterprise resource planning software, the largest supplier to small businesses, and has 6.1 million customers worldwide. Sage is listed on the London Stock Exchange and is a constituent of the FTSE 100 Index. The Company was founded by David Goldman together with Paul Muller and Graham Wylie in 1981 in Newcastle, to develop estimating and accounting software for small businesses.
SugarCRM is a software company based in Cupertino, California. It produces the web application Sugar, a customer relationship management system that is available in both open-source and commercial open-source applications. In February 2014, SugarCRM announced that they would no longer be releasing new open source versions of their Community Edition application and this would now be a bug fix only application.
Sample Customers
Sage CRM
Avis, Fuji Xerox, Formula 1
SugarCRM Platform
Redglaze Group, TengoInternet, Hilco, Bancvue, Vet Adivsor
Popular Solutions
Top Industries
Educational Organization
28%
Computer Software Company
14%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Educational Organization
39%
Computer Software Company
16%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Quotes From Member Reviews
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Most Helpful Reviews
Customer Service
Review 1 of 30
Technical Support
No Data Available
No Data Available
We monitor all reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.